Who Rules the Waves? U.S. and Chinese Fleets, by Tonnage

[SaadH]

Anti-ship ballistic missiles are a joke. It is unproven in combat anywhere
It is another way of saying I do not have a prayer against US Navy carrier group

That would mean no new technology can ever be field because it's not proven in combat.

 

[Lulldapull]

The US is denying any hit to the carrier despite a number of photos circulating in the internet saying so.

The US/ UK were denying the success of the Iranian attack on Israel too.....However dozens of on de ground vidz appeared showing how dishonest that claim was no?

 

[Lulldapull]

Anti-ship ballistic missiles are a joke. It is unproven in combat anywhere
It is another way of saying I do not have a prayer against US Navy carrier group

Maybe Indian media is a jhoke too no? Everybody's long acknowledged the use of an anti-ship ballistic missile on a live target:

Explained: Did World's First Anti-Ship Ballistic Missile Attack Just Happened?

Did the world just see the first combat use of anti-ship ballistic missiles? Military analysts think so. The weapon used by Iran-backed Huthi rebels to attack ships in the Red Sea was not a conventional sea-skimming variety of anti-ship missiles.

www.ndtv.com

Now, coming back to the topic here, who would want to invest in large naval warship fleets when theys so vulnerable? Just like who would want more warplanes or tanks?

Legacy weapons on borrowed time bud. Get reeeehll no?

 

[Awwad]

Now, coming back to the topic here, who would want to invest in large naval warship fleets when theys so vulnerable? Just like who would want more warplanes or tanks?

Nope. Warships are too important and will stay. China too is building lots of massive warships. They are not fools. However, with advancements of technology, its possible that future warships will be largely autonomous and many functions controlled via AI. But presence on seas will always remain important.

If your enemy is 5000 miles away, how you are going to attack it without a navy? Through land based missiles means you need seriously expensive missiles that will be so large containing so much fuel to carry that long distances. However, if you have a navy, then a warship can go to the area and fire lot of cruise missiles. Even to deploy troops to far off distance you need large naval ships to transport the troops and protect them on the way. If you have aircraft carriers, you can bring air-power to that area. Even for drones to fly out, you need a carrier. Turkey is making a drone carrier, Portugal is procuring drone carriers, Even Iran converted a oil tanker and turn it as a drone carrier. So warships are important even if you have to deploy drones to far off distances. If you don't invest in large naval platforms than you cannot fight an enemy that is at a distance. Your whole strategy will become defensive or localized. Just like houthis. They are only localized player, they can only attack at a limited range.

 

[Lulldapull]

Nope. Warships are too important and will stay. China too is building lots of massive warships. They are not fools. However, with advancements of technology, its possible that future warships will be largely autonomous and many functions controlled via AI. But presence on seas will always remain important.

If your enemy is 5000 miles away, how you are going to attack it without a navy? Through land based missiles means you need seriously expensive missiles that will be so large containing so much fuel to carry that long distances. However, if you have a navy, then a warship can go to the area and fire lot of cruise missiles. Even to deploy troops to far off distance you need large naval ships to transport the troops and protect them on the way. If you have aircraft carriers, you can bring air-power to that area. Even for drones to fly out, you need a carrier. Turkey is making a drone carrier, Portugal is procuring drone carriers, Even Iran converted a oil tanker and turn it as a drone carrier. So warships are important even if you have to deploy drones to far off distances. If you don't invest in large naval platforms than you cannot fight an enemy that is at a distance. Your whole strategy will become defensive or localized. Just like houthis. They are only localized player, they can only attack at a limited range

China and da US are building tanks, warplanes and warships to continue supporting their various third whurrlddh toady around da planet in hopes of rescuing their own obsolete industries, until dey make da switch no?........ Just like how we chutiya converts got sold coal fired power plants in CPEC, when coal is toxic death no, as of today? You understand all dis no?

Do mint main tabah hona hae rhim jhim corvette nay in rheel laaf!

Angrezi ich main iss waastay ne likhta kyun k itthay jerray saadday chinese/ roosi/ Irani/ arbi dost na parrh lain saadi galaan......

Dis for only us pendu......

 

[Yommie]

Smaller more automated ships is the future. Big ships are too vulnerable.

 

[SolarWarden]

China and da US are building tanks, warplanes and warships to continue supporting their various third whurrlddh toady around da planet in hopes of rescuing their own obsolete industries, until dey make da switch no?........ Just like how we chutiya converts got sold coal fired power plants in CPEC, when coal is toxic death no, as of today? You understand all dis no?

Do mint main tabah hona hae rhim jhim corvette nay in rheel laaf!

Angrezi ich main iss waastay ne likhta kyun k itthay jerray saadday chinese/ roosi/ Irani/ arbi dost na parrh lain saadi galaan......

Dis for only us pendu......

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Aircraft carriers are not much use in modern warfare. These big ships are vulnerable to drone swarms.

So why China is building aircraft carriers then?

 

[Lulldapull]

View attachment 48163

sorry mate, all I said to him was dat I had serious diarrhea after eating rotten African Hyenuss sashimi here in Japan. I almost went to da hospital.

Damn brah......I'm barely alive bro........phew......

 

[White and Green with M/S]

View attachment 48163

Ignore him bro @Lulldapull is just a brainless troll

 

[Yommie]

So why China is building aircraft carriers then?

Only a few. The rest are all Type 076 drone carriers.

Type 076 landing helicopter dock - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

China in line for world’s first drone carrier, satellite images show: report

Report on ‘mystery ship’ comes as China also builds giant 076 amphibious assault warship that will serve as both a helicopter and drone carrier.

www.scmp.com

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Only a few. The rest are all Type 076 drone carriers.

Na, there will be 5-6 carriers for PLAN in the future, and how do you know the rest will be drone carriers, do you have a backup of your stupid claim or just assuming baseless

 

[Yommie]

Na, there will be 5-6 carriers for PLAN in the future, and how do you know the rest will be drone carriers, do you have a backup of your stupid claim or just assuming baseless

China will build like 10 Fujian size carriers and about 20 Type 076 drone carriers.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Only a few. The rest are all Type 076 drone carriers.

Type 076 landing helicopter dock - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

China in line for world’s first drone carrier, satellite images show: report

Report on ‘mystery ship’ comes as China also builds giant 076 amphibious assault warship that will serve as both a helicopter and drone carrier.

www.scmp.com

Are you in a think tank of PLAN? And drone carriers are much less capable than full fledged aircraft carriers in terms of power projection

 

[White and Green with M/S]

China will build like 10 Fujian size carriers and about 20 Type 076 drone carriers.

Lol and than will economically collapse for building such a huge numbers lol