Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How can anyone be married with such idiot!!!!.
Again, a problem of this war is Iran never invested in a expensive - but critically important weapons platform that could reliably hit HVT targets of Israel.
Very good question. Wonder why the Chinese and Russian firms are also complying with this order to censored and help hide Israeli losses and damage. You'd think they'd happily provide that for everyone to see.
I doubt US will agree to it.. War will continue.
I'm going to chalk this up to fake news until DoD / CENTCOM release the names of the crew.She is willing to Die to Israel, that's why she went there. There are 11,000 US DoD personnel who are serving alongside with Israel and go in for a short-term stay, initially they used to fight for IDF and now since US has its own presence there, they don't need to fight for IDF and directly fighting alongside Israelis.
I doubt US will agree to it.. War will continue.
I doubt US will agree to it.. War will continue.
Please! Either you are misinformed or you are being dishonest. You have been active here for a long time. There were like several threads on this issue on PDF alone. How could you miss them? I'm sure you were active in many of those threads too.
Here's the first link that Google gave me:
![]()
Iran Eyes China’s “Rafale Killer” J-10C as Israel Calls on Beijing to Restrain Tehran - Defence Security Asia
Israel urges China to rein in Iran’s plan to buy J-10C ‘Rafale Killer’ jets as tensions soar over Tehran’s airpower ambitions.defencesecurityasia.com
Yes, it was in early 90s. I have never denied the amicable relations of China and Iran in 90s and early 2000s. The issues started in late 2000s.
Yes, when Saudi Arabia had severed her ties with Iran and was actively fighting Houthis of Yemen, blaming it on Iran. Also, openly threatening Iran with use of force by people like Bin Salman and their Minister of Foreign Affairs.
Good lecture. Now please lecture Persian Gulf Arabs on that too. They are the ones that constantly ask the US for "cutting the head of the snake" and are in a hidden relationship with Israel.
That wasn't the point and you know it too.
In a world where assassinations of leaders and civilian targets are announced openly, do u think Iran should really care about the UNSC? Iran's defense establishment understands Pakistan's real capabilities—more nuanced than you think.I have been here for 15 years or possibly more. So, yeah, after 15 years of discussing politics with the Pakistanis, I understand a thing or two about it.
I don't get your rant about the representation of the Shiite in the Pakistani system of governance. I didn't even talk about it and it doesn't matter to me. I don't get its relevance here either.
Pakistan does not have any means of being more than a messenger in this so-called Accord. First of all, Pakistan is not a permanent member of the UN Security Council. Hence, if this so-called "Accord" is even agreed upon by both sides, and it gets violated by the US tomorrow, Pakistan will be nothing by a bystander per international law.
Secondly, Pakistan does not have a military weight that enables it to challenge the United States in a future conflict with Iran. Sure, you have nuclear weapons but your nuclear arsenal is not even remotely comparable to the US arsenal. And your conventional capabilities do not match the US capabilities either. Your air force is good against an incompetent regional power like India, but will be obliterated against the USAF and USN. You are a regional power at best.
Your ceasefire proposal was one-sided. I don't need to be able to read the minds of Pakistani politicians to see that. Iran gets nothing certain from that deal, literally nothing, while the US achieves one of their main objects in the first step of the deal, i.e. to open the Strait of Hormuz, and they can replenish their depleted ABMs. Also, there is no reason for Iran to agree to US nuclear demands when the US has failed to achieve them through war. So, yes. It is one-sided and you drafted that deal with the presence of KSA, which is a belligerent state in this war.
I don't know man Trump seem kinda desperate.