Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Blain2 said:
I say put the entire onus/blame on Pakistan's insistence and prodding if it gives the two sides an off-ramp. I sincerely hope the two sides take the off-ramp and not let the Zionist bastards derail it yet again.
Click to expand...
"To allow diplomacy to run its course, I earnestly request President Trump to extend the deadline for two weeks. Pakistan, in all sincerity, requests the Iranian brothers to open Strait of Hormuz for a corresponding period of two weeks as a goodwill gesture. We also urge all warring parties to observe a ceasefire everywhere for two weeks to allow diplomacy to achieve conclusive termination of war, in the interest of long-term peace and stability in the region. "

I think Trump will agree to two weeks deadline extension here and Iran will agree to not attacking GCC. as for Hormuz, It will be interesting to see what iran says.
 
kobra said:
Its not about patience. its about upcoming loses and suffering of normal civilians. Do you argue that one side can deliver much much more pain on the other and there is huge imbalance of strength.

Daily salvos of 10-12 missiles did not prove painful enough for israil to stop hitting civilians. otherwise these rats are most cowardly crying bunch. if they were receiving unbearable pain, they would have stopped already.
Click to expand...
People start becoming pessimistic it’s war it’s not a sprint to the finish it’s a marathon it’s who has will and endurance to make it to the finish line no matter if your body is battered you end the race in your own two feet it’s a win
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
ShapurII said:
Nobody cares about favorable internal pressure in the West. We don't, they don't, Israel doesn't.

If Iran accepts a ceasefire, we have lost the war. It is a premature declaration of surrender. And I hope the Islamic Republic would be kicked fast and get replaced by whatever regime that will be subservient to the US.
Click to expand...
Ok bro, not to flog a dead horse, but there is a distinction between a temporary cessation, versus agreeing to overly generous terms of a temporary cessation.

No one is asking for the latter, but they are trying to get to the former



And this notional period is likely to be just the first attempt and you may end up going back to war anyway, but at least that clarifies a terms of reference for a future negotiation.

You see the subtlety here is to prevent a disastrous spiral with some pause for a ceasefire and negotiation.

Just because you agree to a ceasefire hardly means you accept a surrender, that is nonsense if you retain the ability to continue, then you simply continue

And ultimately Iran does want to come to the negotiating table
 
Immortals said:
Yes

Asking Iran to give its biggest concession up without anything in return (a ceasefire for 2 weeks is worth nothing when you already been bombed 15,000 times) is a dumb proposal.

This ceasefire proposal was completely slanted towards US and Israel and the Arab nations.

Dead on arrival.

But what more do you expect from Pakistan PM who was praising Trump for being the beacon of peace just weeks ago at the farce “Board of Peace” summit.
Click to expand...
2 weeks with good chance it becomes permanent (given that Trump wants out) is much better than the alternative. If things do go bad again what’s stopping u closing the Hormuz again? Fight to death without any compromise is great but will probably result in exactly that and is playing into Isreal’s hands.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Just like 12 day war — Israel is requesting a ceasefire once its interceptors got too low.

The Zionist loves Zarif, Rouhani, and Larijani clan are all but happy to stop attacking because they want to be accepted by the Zionists just like the Persian Gulf Arab Monarchs.
 
Blain2 said:
I say put the entire onus/blame on Pakistan's insistence and prodding if it gives the two sides an off-ramp. I sincerely hope the two sides take the off-ramp and not let the Zionist bastards derail it yet again.
Click to expand...

Zionist will derail it... That is guaranteed as the sun rising from the East (for now).
 
kobra said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Chances are that he doesn't speak English and he wanted to sound intelligent.
We have the most incompetent people in the highest places. Khamenei was one of them.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
mangekyo said:
It doesn’t matter who is brokering the ceasefire. 7 parties, 31 countries negotiated the JCPOA and it took only one country to break the agreement. Israel never honored a ceasefire before. Its not going to be different this time. Why would it be different this time?
Click to expand...
Agreed, so what is the plan? Fight till Israel is destroyed (not feasible as Iran has no ability unless it goes nuclear)? Or the US is destroyed? Or the GCC is destroyed?

What is the end-game for Iran?

While it pleases me to see Iran tell the US/Israel to go forth and multiply and face whatever consequences come its way bravely, I also worry about the damage Iran will take in the process.
 
r3alist said:
Ok bro, not to flog a dead horse, but there is a distinction between a temporary cessation, versus agreeing to overly generous terms of a temporary cessation.

No one is asking for the latter, but they are trying to get to the former



And this notional period is likely to be just the first attempt and you may end up going back to war anyway, but at least that clarifies a terms of reference for a future negotiation.

You see the subtlety here is to prevent a disastrous spiral with some pause for a ceasefire and negotiation.

Just because you agree to a ceasefire hardly means you accept a surrender, that is nonsense if you retain the ability to continue, then you simply continue

And ultimately Iran does want to come to the negotiating table
Click to expand...
Are you the representative of Iran? What right do you have to claim that ultimately Iran wants to come to the negotiating table?

And yes, a ceasefire in Iran's case means a surrender. It will also reset Trump's 60-day privilege to declare war without congressional approval.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 110 (members: 8, guests: 102)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top