Indian Air Force News and Discussions ll

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Sorry to burst your bubble here but


70% is low

UASF T-38s are 60/70 years old. IAF Hawks are 18 years old. Get a grip of yourself....
It is not, unless you prove evidence that any airforce has trainers with 75%+ serviceablity.
2008 USAF figures also show T-38 had serviceability of 64.8%.
 
Literally the article is stating the IAF has not even begun the indigenisation process, basically you do not want to actually believe your own eyes or the words of the IAF. That is fine by me.

Every post of yours on here gets more desperate.
Indiginezation of 70% components already began 6 years before itself, what this article is saying that remaining 20-30% are being indigenized too.
 
It is not, unless you prove evidence that any airforce has trainers with 75%+ serviceablity.
2008 USAF figures also show T-38 had serviceability of 64.8%.

Again, comapring 70 year old T-38s with 18 year old Hawks. Basically admitting USAF does a far better job in maintenence then the IAF?
 
Again, comapring 70 year old T-38s with 18 year old Hawks. Basically admitting USAF does a far better job in maintenence then the IAF?

And soon - we will be discussing how the Rafales in the IAF will have similar servicing levels as the Hawk.

Thankfully, nothing works properly in the IAF.
 
And soon - we will be discussing how the Rafales in the IAF will have similar servicing levels as the Hawk.

Thankfully, nothing works properly in the IAF.

Would not surprise me if Rafale servicability is low, they have been using them on Chinese border too. Do you know if they got the private contract for Dassault to guarantee service levels?

My guess is if they have 28 odd left and with say 75% availability they may have just 18-20 ready to fly
 
Again, comapring 70 year old T-38s with 18 year old Hawks. Basically admitting USAF does a far better job in maintenence then the IAF?
Again you failed to provide evidence that there are jet trainers with any force with more than 75% serviceability
 
Look who is asking for links.


Do your own googling Rakesh. Also, you do know the link you posted refers to Base Repair Depots not actual aircraft, you do know that right? Please please please tell me you are not this thick?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top