Indian Air Force News and Discussions ll

[Yasser76]

Air Force Officer Lured By Woman On Chats To Leak Defence Secrets To Pak Handler: Cops

 

[indo17787]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[indo17787]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Gregor Clegane]

Sorry to burst your bubble here but


70% is low

UASF T-38s are 60/70 years old. IAF Hawks are 18 years old. Get a grip of yourself....

It is not, unless you prove evidence that any airforce has trainers with 75%+ serviceablity.
2008 USAF figures also show T-38 had serviceability of 64.8%.

 

[Gregor Clegane]

Literally the article is stating the IAF has not even begun the indigenisation process, basically you do not want to actually believe your own eyes or the words of the IAF. That is fine by me.

Every post of yours on here gets more desperate.

Indiginezation of 70% components already began 6 years before itself, what this article is saying that remaining 20-30% are being indigenized too.

 

[Yasser76]

Indiginezation of 70% components already began 6 years before itself, what this article is saying that remaining 20-30% are being indigenized too.

Got a link for this or is this a wet dream again?

 

[Yasser76]

It is not, unless you prove evidence that any airforce has trainers with 75%+ serviceablity.
2008 USAF figures also show T-38 had serviceability of 64.8%.

Again, comapring 70 year old T-38s with 18 year old Hawks. Basically admitting USAF does a far better job in maintenence then the IAF?