m52k85
Registered Member
Yes, I also remember a 1.35 to 1.75 ratio some ACM mentioned, along with a sweet spot of between 375 to 400 combat airplanes. However we do not know on what part of the fleet the PAF high-ups apply the ratio.from memory, PAF's fleet strength is tied to the IAF's, Mujahid Anwar Khan mentioned a ratio, though, ive forgotten now
If we look at BVR enabled squadrons, PAF has 12 (8 + 3 + 1) and IAF 21 (12 + 3 + 3 + 2 + 1) with more Tejas in the pipeline. PAF will surely be worried. Also, the current IAF chief has told the public pretty much the best IAF can do is 35 squadrons in the next 10 years. If PAF can increase the mix of BVR squadrons they will continue to sit in a comfortable place even if overall sqd numbers decrease slightly.
The only problem is the only near term options for PAF are looking risky (Jf-17 next iteration in development and no evidence of further J-10 purchase), in other words there could very possibly be nothing in the pipeline as opposed to the IAF having 4 odd Tejas squadrons in the works.
PAF could also be looking at AESA based BVR squadrons, and looking to maintain a good ratio on those, but ofcourse those developments are much harder to spot in the public.










