bunyan-al-marsous: JF-17A delivering CM-400AKG

Dude i already saw some craters in an airbase, i also saw some in Pak bases. Both are not substantial damage, the real kill is the radars and plane, otherwise runway damages are useless. Stop trying to cop3 with this? I know the paim from 5 jets down but claiming all airbases are destroyed is just plain stupid. Nl
We have no problem to accept 5 or 10 planes down, all we asking is some credible source. Share the photos for Indian side damage please.
 
Yes the HQ9P is actually quite potent, it supposedly beat the Russians and Americans in the race for a Turkish contract but was forced by NATO to stop that purchase, a few years later the Turks went for S400.

I have no doubt about that. But I can't imagine a scenario where an S400 fires a SAM missile and the the HQ-9, another SAM fires to destroy it? Since when SAMs are used to intercept SAMs? Something wrong with this story.
 
No s400 intercepted one of you short range ballistic missile. HQ 9 did nothing really.
To be fair brahmos is a very capable missile. We Pakistanis dont have a problem accepting, our mentality is just not like that.
 
Yes the HQ9P is actually quite potent, it supposedly beat the Russians and Americans in the race for a Turkish contract but was forced by NATO to stop that purchase, a few years later the Turks went for S400.
Slow clap, a surface to air missile intercepting another surface to air missile, but why.
 
I have no doubt about that. But I can't imagine a scenario where an S400 fires a SAM missile and the the HQ-9, another SAM fires to destroy it? Since when SAMs are used to intercept SAMs? Something wrong with this story.
Normally that would not happen, but S-400 is a very long range SAM, that russia has also utilised in a ground attack role. The longest range missile on it is huge, flies in the air for a long time, comes down from above, not too different from a theater ballistic missile. Hence it is not unconceivable that an SAM shoots down an S-400 shot.
 
It was intercepted and it is not the CM-400 - put likely Fatah being intercepted.
Kitnay saal ho gaey hain in bachodon ko bukvaas kartay? Iran dis Iran dat?......lol

Do thapurr bhund pe lugganay ka time aya hae ab!

Evidently, Iranis a century ahead of us in modern warfare.

Idher Eff-sola aur J-10 key jalaybiyaan baich rahay hain ghareeb log.

I'm so sick of it.

Air Force just got exposed as junk and obsolete no?
 
We have no problem to accept 5 or 10 planes down, all we asking is some credible source. Share the photos for Indian side damage please.
An indian asking for photos and proof while spreading fake information is a national effort in india:mad:
 
We have no problem to accept 5 or 10 planes down, all we asking is some credible source. Share the photos for Indian side damage please.
An indian asking for photos and proof while spreading fake information is a national effort in india:mad:
 
We have no problem to accept 5 or 10 planes down, all we asking is some credible source. Share the photos for Indian side damage please.
I just gave an IDRW link with pictures showing a downed S400 inside pAkistan. The missile was destroyed, and Paks claimed it was downed by HQ9P. So either S400 failed but looking at the condition, it seems to have been blown up.

You have multiple failed Brahmos dropping inside India, Python-5 with intact seeker (not the exploded fried PL15 which you claim as 'intact'). So what's new?
 
To be fair brahmos is a very capable missile. We Pakistanis dont have a problem accepting, our mentality is just not like that.
Of course it is capable, it is a Russian Oniks with Indian paint.
 
What do you want, would PAF releases recordings of strikes on S-400 and can give the enemy hints that how CM 400AKG WORKS? LOL

Any time we tell our story there are two audiences: the domestic one and the international one.

As a Pakistani, I don't even need this; I am willing to believe our official statements. However, when looking at something in the international context, we need to ask the obvious question 'would we believe this if India claimed it?'

@Samurai has written that our satellite photos are very poor quality compared to what India is providing to support their claims in this war. I haven't formed an opinion because I haven't looked at either side's photos but it wouldn't surprise me if it's true.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top