Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Now that I look back at it, it does look fake. But the person who sent it to me said it was real. It could be because of low quality.Is this real? Looks a bit AI
Any Idea of PL17 (PL21) integration possibility with J10C..
If yes then what are chances of PAF J10s with have this integration and availability of Pl 17 .....
IMO of PAF if have this option, then that can wait for J35s maturity and availability as well.. ....
Plus can counter Indian new induction possibilities of long rang BRVs from Israel and Russia to counter PAF ...
Will reduce ... potential threat to our AWACS and EW , instead convert this thread towards India..
@Oscar @Quwa @MastanKhan @arslank01 @Waz @Windjammer @Panzerkiel @Bilal
The potential availability of the J-10CE production line presents a strategic opportunity for Pakistan to acquire this capability as a comprehensive package. Pakistan should prioritize securing this deal, whether through financing arrangements or other means (gurday bhaijnay parhay ya koyi local mineral mine ki deal kar kay karna parhay karlo..sorry zyadaa jazbaati ho gaya hun?), as it is critical for bolstering its defense industry. By acquiring the production line, Pakistan could manufacture over 200 J-10CE aircraft domestically (humaray apnay fleet kay liye), incorporating its own modifications to meet specific operational requirements. Furthermore, with China's consent and potential collaboration, Pakistan could explore exporting these aircraft to other nations, generating economic benefits and strengthening defense ties. This move aligns with Pakistan's long-term goals of enhancing self-reliance in defense manufacturing and expanding its role in the global arms market.
Na, PL-17 is not for J-10C which is a medium weight jet, PL-17 is for heavy weight jets like J-10C So its useless to integrate PL-17 on J-10CAny Idea of PL17 (PL21) integration possibility with J10C..
If yes then what are chances of PAF J10s with have this integration and availability of Pl 17 .....
IMO of PAF if have this option, then that can wait for J35s maturity and availability as well.. ....
Plus can counter Indian new induction possibilities of long rang BRVs from Israel and Russia to counter PAF ...
Will reduce ... potential threat to our AWACS and EW , instead convert this thread towards India..
Like r37 missile?Na, PL-17 is not for J-10C which is a medium weight jet, PL-17 is for heavy weight jets like J-10C So its useless to integrate PL-17 on J-10C
says who...?Since it's a medium tier jet, after a couple of blocks, a stealth project could've been started for evaluation to build a stealthier version of J-10C's future blocks. That would've been much easier to do,
Yes like Su-35/R-37M comboLike r37 missile?
says who...?
lo is not just take part -> make pointy.
'modifying' a design to be 'stealthy' is not the "easier" route to take.
VLO designs are baked deep into the fundamental design/structure.
It's takes lots of time to develop stealth version of JF-17 we will have to re-design whole it from nose to tailOk. Its clear how much you know about airframe design! If we can build a JF-17's stealthy version, what on earth makes you think we can't do that with J-10C's canard design where J-20's canard design can easily be reduced to fit? In fact, you might see a stealthy design by the PAF based on J-20 like canards and J-20 cross with J-10.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.