Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
S.Arabia wants to join the KAAN project
KAAN is halal product ...![]()
Turkey should offer them irresistible deals, something Germany and others would refuse, codevelopment and local production even if the order is large enough. I think there is a market for NATO standard product, that is compatible with their older purchases of western defense equiptment, but with less strings attached.

beyond the design phase
We may see the first prototype in 2026
TR-MOTOR is a completely different team from TEI
TEI develops TF-6.000 and TF-10.000 turbofan Engines
TR-MOTOR + TEI + IVCHENKO PROGRESS together develops 35.000 lbf turbofan Engine
Ukrainian Ivchenko-Progress is providing technical assistance for the development of an indigenous turbofan engine for the KAAN.
View attachment 22068
If you really try with IVCHENKO PROGRESS, then this new engine is doomed from the beginning! IVCHENKO PROGRESS has not built a single true modern high-end turbofan engine since when? (in fact if ever) and on a technology base Turkey can rather learn nothing for a true +160kN from them.

We don't know anything about the work agreement between IP and TAI. However, it is a publicly well-known fact that IP's technologies are more or less outdated, although, this doesn't have to mean much. IP and its infrastructure and workforce could be used to outsource laborious detail work that has to be done anyways.If you really try with IVCHENKO PROGRESS, then this new engine is doomed from the beginning! IVCHENKO PROGRESS has not built a single true modern high-end turbofan engine since when? (in fact if ever) and on a technology base Turkey can rather learn nothing for a true +160kN from them.







If you really try with IVCHENKO PROGRESS, then this new engine is doomed from the beginning! IVCHENKO PROGRESS has not built a single true modern high-end turbofan engine since when? (in fact if ever) and on a technology base Turkey can rather learn nothing for a true +160kN from them.
As far as I understand, IVCHENKO PROGRESS will support two issues. 1- In the design of engine accessories. 2- It will help in the overall design of the ecosystem.If you really try with IVCHENKO PROGRESS, then this new engine is doomed from the beginning!
I can't tell if you're genuinely doubting...or playing a reverse psychology game where your doubting will encourage the KAAN stakeholders to work faster and do the improbable.If you really try with IVCHENKO PROGRESS, then this new engine is doomed from the beginning! IVCHENKO PROGRESS has not built a single true modern high-end turbofan engine since when? (in fact if ever) and on a technology base Turkey can rather learn nothing for a true +160kN from them.
We don't know anything about the work agreement between IP and TAI. However, it is a publicly well-known fact that IP's technologies are more or less outdated, although, this doesn't have to mean much. IP and its infrastructure and workforce could be used to outsource laborious detail work that has to be done anyways.
Transnational cooperation agreements between two entities don't have to involve knowledge sharing.
I believe that the Ukrainian input is limited in nature and their main job is to accelerate the development of the project.
As long as we don't get insights, everything said about their business relationship and the degree of IP's contribution is conjecture.
Agreed, but how should or could a company that never ever itself developed a modern turbofan engine in even close that thrust-range - and Kaan requires even more than IP ever proposed with the RD-33 successor/replacement program - is surely an argument or concern,

Ivchenko Progress developed Engines in 1960s , When China did not know even what about Engine
Modernity = Turkiye
Experience = Ukraine
You also said same things about the KAAN Fighter Jet 3 years ago
Turkiye has no experience to develop even a 4th gen Fighter Jet
how can Turkiye develop modern 5th gen Fighter Jet ?
look at again
View attachment 22636
Yep, the narrative was Turkey can't even develop a 4th Gen fighter, that this was "domestic propaganda" they called it an "Iranian Hoax"/"North Korea Hoax" to fool their people, now suddenly they pivot to engine engine engine. Not only do they not acknowledge that Turkey flew a prototype, but AHEAD of schedule.
The engine is obviously definitely harder, but The project is already successful with GE110 engines. People forget that the Rafale flew with GE404 engine initially, and that the Saab Gripen flew with GE404 engine, yet no one uses the engine talking point against them.
These narratives are so annoying, Altay tank is a "failure" but K2 Black Panther is a success. when really they both have the same achilles heel of a German Powerpack. They try to compare it to the Arjun Tank, that actually has performance failures, not political failures. It not like the Altay didn't go into production b/c of other issues, they talk performed incredibly well in testing, the production hit a snag b/c of an embargo of engines, If the Germans did the same thing to the K2, would that be a failure?
These narratives are so annoying, Altay tank is a "failure" but K2 Black Panther is a success. when really they both have the same achilles heel of a German Powerpack. They try to compare it to the Arjun Tank, that actually has performance failures, not political failures. It not like the Altay didn't go into production b/c of other issues, they talk performed incredibly well in testing, the production hit a snag b/c of an embargo of engines, If the Germans did the same thing to the K2, would that be a failure?

We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.