Joe Shearer
INT'L MOD
- Apr 19, 2009
- 31,959
- 48,758
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
What have you to say that is any different? It is your observations that you oppose to mine.It seems to me all you said is your observation of the situations and not necessarily the truth.
That is a ridiculous proposition and you know it. In every single case, commencing with crony capitalism at the job creation stage, and proceeding to situating industries in parts of the country that vote for a faction, every single observer can see the interplay of voting patterns and favours done, and you have the temerity to ask for a personal profile of all job candidates and accepted workers?When you make such assertations as you are making in this post, aka people of certain political affiliations getting all the jobs, you better please provide sources and data (unbiased) to back it up.
How do you verify the amounts extorted by the government that you seem to favour so greatly before independent observers made the connections? How do you expect those connections except by a laborious census operation on the spot?Unverified assertations such as these are beneath any mod on any self respecting forum.
Will you next ask for proof that major sports bodies are sought to be controlled by the same political faction?
In short, where the evidence is clear and tangible, you turn your gaze away, where it is not established plainly, you stand tall and deny any wrong-doing.
That is your opinion, that there is no affiliation. How is your opinion more valid than anyone else's? Do you have proof that there is no affiliation? Have you personally gone down and checked? Or do you have recorded published proof that it is not so?Your opinion is not a valid reason to mock 4000 people who have no affiliation to this project other than seeking a job.
How silly can you get?
You may find my explanation anything at all. Beauty, after all, lies in the eyes of the beholder, and for people who are called andh bhakts, the description itself gives the observer a clue as to what they perceive, and its close match with what they wish to perceive.And your explanation is even more unbecoming. If you can provide sources and back up your observations and assertations i will more than happily retract my statements.
Please provide sources that back up your denial thqt these jobs are to be given to the politically favoured, who have been voting for the political faction in question.
You are, of course, free to retract your statements at any time. The point is, unlike the situation on the ground, you are free, here, to make those statements. Others, in real life, are not.