Announcement: New forum feature, SpeedLimit

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr X
  • Start date Start date
And how do we know the religious breakdown of the offendees? It is only the posts that determine that Group.

It is very easy for us.

Like you guys know everyone's sect and ethnicity.

Live it to know it.

Cheers, Doc
 
It is very easy for us.

Like you guys know everyone's sect and ethnicity.

Live it to know it.

Cheers, Doc

Sounds more like a coordinated gang muscling in but that’s just my opinion. 😁
 
One too many, how many Indian forums do you see with Pakistani moderators?

I was referring to the speed limited Hindus.

Not the ones in charge.

It is not my position to comment on the Admin decision on moderation.

It has been my position since Post #1 that banning is stupid.

Selective temporary gagging is better. Which is essentially what this thread is about.

And buddy, you have been on and on about your Hindjew trip since Day 1 when there were no Indian moderators. Do recall. Just setting the record straight. Coz you making it sound like you are reacting, whereas it has been your prime agenda since joining.

Cheers, Doc
 
Good job, apply the same to new users for 1 month. A new user should be reading through the library, to read 1000s of posts and updating their knowledge and not posting 20 messages a day
What about people who came from PDF, like myself?
 
What about people who came from PDF, like myself?
Admin has already answered that in this thread:
 
And how do we know the religious breakdown of the offendees? It is only the posts that determine that Group.
Don't pass this rule please. It's a terrible decision and would destroy the whole forum and purpose of it. There should be no limit to reply or starting threads. Still if you want to place limit than it should be 75 to 100 for replies and 25 to 40 for threads.
@Mr X @RescueRanger @VCheng @Musings
 
Don't pass this rule please. It's a terrible decision and would destroy the whole forum and purpose of it. There should be no limit to reply or starting threads. Still if you want to place limit than it should be 75 to 100 for replies and 25 to 40 for threads.
@Mr X @RescueRanger @VCheng @Musings

I have nothing to do with the implementation but I am sure management will take all the feedback into account. Look at how swiftly they acted in correcting my moderation errors and removed my privileges. They will remove or modify the rule in the best interests of the forum I am sure.
 
I have nothing to do with the implementation but I am sure management will take all the feedback into account. Look at how swiftly they acted in correcting my moderation errors and removed my privileges. They will remove or modify the rule in the best interests of the forum I am sure.
Please send my suggestions to them.
 
I disagree with this one. i can see the aim of this rule, but i believe this will be counterproductive and hinder contributions and remove the fun from the discussion. spammers and trolls should be warned and banned if they break the rules without limiting other users.
 
Don't pass this rule please. It's a terrible decision and would destroy the whole forum and purpose of it. There should be no limit to reply or starting threads. Still if you want to place limit than it should be 75 to 100 for replies and 25 to 40 for threads.
@Mr X @RescueRanger @VCheng @Musings
I think you have misunderstood. The speed-limit rule only applies to people who have been reported for trolling or other offences multiple times. You are free to post as many posts as you want, as long as you don't do that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top