So far I have not seen any adequate explanation on how synthetic aperture radar (SAR) works despite claims of showing sources that supposed to show how the concept works. So here goes...
Imagine you are taking a picture of a model. Say a nude woman to make it interesting. Your camera have a limited aperture as all lenses do. You take one snapshot, move one meter, take another snapshot, move one meter, take another snapshot, and so on, until you completed a full circle of the model. Each snapshot adds to the previous and the sum is logically larger than the actual lens physical aperture. That was a simplified explanation of a 'synthetic' or fake aperture. The critical component here is that you have to move.
The weakness of the SAR concept is: What if the model move? In other words, a SAR works best when the target is mostly stationary. Moving targets produces noise in the SAR signal processing.
The launch of high resolution radar satellites such as the German TerraSAR-X satellite (launched in summer 2006, resolution of 1m, 3m or 16m m depending on the recording mode) opened new possibilities in monitoring traffic flows from space. Indeed, the German Aerospace Centre (DLR) has developed...
geoawesomeness.com
However, the detection of moving objects faces some difficulties, as the motion on ground provokes a shift of the object in the SAR image. Moving objects appear shifted from their actual road or network position: Cars or trucks seem to drive on fields; trains, which are well represented as whitish long lines (see figure below), are shifted into the surroundings of the actual tracks and also ships appear apart from their actual route (see second image below).
...standard SAR-processing methods are based upon the assumption of a static scene or in other words the stationary of the detected objects. If the target has a velocity component, its doppler shift is changed compared with that from a stationary reflector. As a consequence the SAR gets confused and produces artefacts in the final image displacing the motion objects.
To detect moving objects...
Two SAR antennas are spatially aligned...
In other words, to
TRACK moving objects using SAR, at least two SAR platforms must be in play. Motion detection is not tracking. Motion detection is about responding to a change. Tracking is about
CONSTANT responses to continuous changes. Critical difference is that the latter requires much more processing power.
One SAR can track ships, but not an airplane. The system can display image shifts, noise, and assort anomalies that will point to the airplane, but it cannot track the airplane with the granularity of a regular radar.
Can a SAR detect and track an F-22? At this point -- no.