niubi
Registered Member
How could this possibly be the H-20.....
Its size is so small.......
View attachment 197949
You can see the staff below.
This place looks more like a scientific research institution.
From the analysis of the national military development strategy, we don't currently need a new type of bomber. The reason is that the mission of a bomber is to carry out strikes outside the enemy's defense zone, not to fly over the enemy and drop bombs. Long-range missiles can satisfy this tactic, and the bomber is just a platform. Bombers only need to carry out launch missions outside the enemy radar detection range (over 600 km).
Pakistan's use of J-10C and PL-15 confirmed the reliability of this tactic. The J-10C launched PL-15 from outside India's radar detection range. The Pakistani military suffered no losses, but the results were very impressive.
The aircraft in the image/CGI looks considerably larger than B-21 and only slightly smaller than B-2 if even that.
Also your other examples make no sense at all. Stand off only is not good enough. Stand off and being able to drop dumb bombs right on top of target is valuable and I'm not sure why you can't understand this. GJ-11 is doing exactly both stand off attacks and cheaper attacks. Stand off weapons are 10x more costly and harder to make than glide bombs.
China has pursued both just like it pursued asymmetric means to counter America while also pursuing symmetric dominance. It builds both detonation engine powered hypersonic weapons and unguided rockets fired off J-20. It's all pursued. I bet H-20 will need to have ability to drop iron bombs and glide bombs.










