get all of what you're saying, but just on the point of BVR I have to disagree. You can train your nuts off with all the anti-BVR tactics you want, but the fact is first look-first shoot is overwhelmingly determinant when it comes to air dominance, more so now than ever. The PAF for at least two decades suffered immensely in this regard vs the IAF, and paid heavily for it. That balance of equation has now shifted dramatically,
Has it, really? Just because of 1 skirmish? Now before you judge my response, I'm not taking anything away from the PAF Feb. 2019 shootdown. If anything, the fact that the PAF was able to take the initiative on that particular kill is only a testament that adds & supports what I'm saying with regards to the training factor. The fact that the PAF trains so well gave them that ability to take the quick initiative and make the kill faster than the IAF pilot did.
But at the same time, that could've gone either way which I think is a huge factor many miss. Not to mention the aircraft that was targeted, was in no way comparable to the PAF F-16B. Despite how great the Indian MiG-21 Bison is (hell it's on my avatar lol), it's still no comparison to the F-16 and the munition difference between the two at that time. Not to mention the ground control issues that greatly affected the outcome AND the distance. That distance is reported on almost every single online source as 7 kilometers. 7 KILOMETERS, my friend.
I had this discussion on another Air Power forum where all these ex-pilots talk heavy techno lingo and the general consensus between all the available & published information was that the distance was anywhere from 5km to 25km. That's within range of 98% of current SHORT-RANGE missiles! My point is as great as it was, it's hardly an indication that the great concept of BVR and greater distance-capable missiles are the dominant factor that make one platform "useless" vs the other.
I'm not going to go into the rest of the political issues etc, but the reason the zionists are afraid of Egypt is >100million nation against less then 10million, simple as that.
Sure, that too. But the main reason is because of past aerial battle history between the Egyptian air force & Israeli.
When they pulled off that sleezy preemptive attack in 1967 and destroyed practically our entire air force on the ground, we never had even had a chance to go up against them. So they were all high & mighty on their halucination that they were some superior entity and that Egyptian pilots were no match and all that crap. How could they even think that when we didn't even have a chance to fight? But that was the problem we see even until today, people give them way more credit than they deserve because right after that, from 1967 to 1970 the EAF conducted the War of Attrition which saw a lot of dogfighting where we also lost a lot of battles but scored a bunch of wins as well. The stigma started changing and they began to realize they weren't all that they thought they were and more importantly, the EAF & Egyptian determination wasn't what they thought it was.
Then the October War of 1973 happened and things really took a turn, especially on the 14th of October during the battle of Al Mansoura. The Israelis tried to conduct another attack on Egyptain air bases in Tanta and Al Mansoura as a diversion to conduct their crossing of the Suez Canal in Sinai and that's when they ran into the real EAF. The zionist sent over 100 Phantoms & Skyhawks to bomb the two air bases and Mubarak who was the air force chief at the time and planned the defense of the bases and told all the squadrons to hold position until the zionist came within a few kilometers then sent the MiG-21s who pounced on the enemy. That air battle lasted 57 minutes straight and, in the end, the losses were 17 enemy aircraft to 3 EAF MiG-21s.
THAT is what changed the entire perception and has made the zionist scared shitless of the EAF and why they fight tooth & nail to prevent us from acquiring any advanced BVR missiles because they know that with those, they would be in a heap of crap. More so than the population factor you mentioned.
The sooner you guys learn to wean yourselves off the US the better. Although that's easier said that done given the political interference uncle Sam likes to do.
Weaning off? I don't think that's the proper term. The only reason Egypt accepted the military aid was because it knew that without it at the time, the zionist were going to get it and that would've left Egypt in the dark and way behind. That was the only way to stay within reach as much as possible. It was the best option and made all the sense.
Think of the heavy price the US has to pay Egypt for that QME it cares so much about. Why not bribe the crap out of the US and benefit from it as much as possible while at the same time, add to that bribery with other equipment from other sources and that's what we've been doing. When you say "weaning off" you give the impression that it's like a baby dependent on mommy's titty milk when that's so insulting and demeaning lol, it's not even close to reality. People use that to make it sound like Egypt is totally dependent on the US, and while a large percentage of the equipment is, there is also a large contingent of equipment from other sources. We had a huge fleet of Mirage 5s for decades. Huge fleet of F-7s, Apha Jets, even K-8 Karakorum. Funny how people ignore that, isn't it?
Our Navy is huge ranked 1st in Africa, 6th in the world and would swallow the zionist navy whole. Made up of US, French, Italian, German, Chinese and other European platforms funny how people ignore that, isn't it?
Our air defense which is HUGE is made up mostly of Russian systems, the best in the world. Now we've brought in the IRIS-T-SL/SLM which is a deadly advanced German system and purchasing more because of how prolific it is and how much the EADS loves it.
Our Armored Corp. While most of the tanks are in fact US-made in the M1A1 Abrams & M60/A3s, the new contracts were for the local assembly of the 500 Russian T-90MS' and now has shifted to a similar number of the deadly Korean K2.
Add the Rafale (that's a shift away from the US even though it's considered "western"), the MiG-29M/M2s, the attempt at the Su-35S at least was a valiant effort but not at the cost of ruining the Egyptian economy - a credit to Sisi which goes unnoticed because he's a "dictator, suppressing his own people" lol. Another false misconception designed to degrade and defame only.
So you see, that "weaning off" you're talking about, started a loooong time ago.
Things are much more involved than simplistic observations like BVR missiles only. Fact is, there is so much more that factors in and the EAF's F-16s are a huge and vert effective part of the current structure, regardless of the AIM-7 vs the AIM-120.