Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

I think we need both HQ-9B and HQ-19 to counter Israeli threats. And we need at least 6 batteries of each. And it's still going to be useless without an air force.

We really need to mass produce Bavar-373 for our needs. We need to recover our OTH radars, multi-static radars and complement our AD without AEW&C.

Getting those systems is a better approach than getting figher planes. Planes require a long time for pilots to get trained properly, but AD systems can be fully operational in no time.
 
Getting those systems is a better approach than getting figher planes. Planes require a long time for pilots to get trained properly, but AD systems can be fully operational in no time.
You cannot have an air defense without an air force. They complement each other.
 
If Khamenei is not compromised, or at least fit for his role, Pezeshkian should be impeached and a new interim president should be installed by Khamenei.
 
I’m sorry, but I must say something harsh. China places great importance on its cooperative relationships with the United States and Israel, and conversely, it even looks down on Iran.
There is absolutely no way China would export useful weapons to Iran.
Even HUAWEI cooperates with Israel.
I shared my opinion because I thought many of you might not be well-informed about the realities in China.
Correction. Chinese population's opinion is pretty much against Israel now esp in view of what it has done recently to Palestine and the Mideast. There isn't much cooperation between China and Israel nowadays. US isn't as important as it used to be after the trade and tech wars it started years ago, China's trade with US and dependence on its tech have greatly reduced.
Why would Huawei not do business in Israel ? Unless Israel is under US pressure not to. Huawei is a private commercial company.
It's true most Chinese don't think China and Iran have close relation and are allies.
 
Last edited:


Seyed Hossein Mousavian, former Iranian Ambassador to Germany and ex-nuclear negotiator:

Russia didn’t provide Iran with Su-35 fighter jets or the S-400 defense system, despite Iran being under threat for decades from nuclear powers like the U.S. and Israel — and ultimately attacked by them.

Yet, Russia offered India — a U.S. ally — 117 Su-35Ms and joint Su-57 production with full tech transfer.

This isn’t a criticism of Moscow; it’s acting in its strategic interest. If Türkiye (a NATO member) or Saudi Arabia (a U.S. ally) request Su-35s, Su-57s, or S-400s, Russia would likely agree.

Maybe this reality helps Tehran better understand international relations and the true nature of national interests.

I have always said that Russia should never be seen as an ally or aligned when Israel is involved in the issue. I will never tire of repeating that.

In fact, it becomes yet another state that will no longer do business importing weapons from Russia, and the Russians will lose yet another customer forever.

In the long term, China will become the third largest exporter, ahead of the Russians, but still behind the US and France.
 
Bunker busters are equipped with highly advanced fuses that detonate precisely at the planned depth.
This allows them to progressively penetrate rock layers, easily destroying even deeply buried facilities.
There is no doubt that the Fordow facility sustained significant damage.
Just a reminder that the USAF has requested new fuses for the GBU-57 Heavy Artillery Disruptor.

The new fuses are intended to increase the accuracy of operation, the penetration power and the ability to destroy targets in depth.

The changes may include improvements in the explosion time or the ability to penetrate more layers of protection.
 

This account never provides any links to what he posts.
Here is the full article from Reuters. It does not mention zero enrichment.

Russia says it's ready to remove highly enriched uranium from Iran​

MOSCOW, June 11 (Reuters) - Russia said on Wednesday it stood ready to remove highly enriched uranium from Iran and convert it into civilian reactor fuel as a potential way to help narrow U.S.-Iranian differences over the Islamic Republic's nuclear programme.
Tehran says it has the right to peaceful nuclear power, but its swiftly-advancing uranium enrichment programme has raised fears in the wider West and across the Gulf that it wants to develop a nuclear weapon.

 
Unnecessary , country should have full control of all Defence matters

The idea to move the enrichment to another country makes no sense
Should continue to develop in house capabilities
 
BBC, the propaganda arm of the British, interviews the former prime minister, who claims that it was Israel's strategic patience that paused to give Iran time to reconsider. You have analysts like Scott Ritter, Prof Mearsheimer, and people like Steve Bannon saying Trump had to step in to save Israel. Who is telling the truth?
 
BBC, the propaganda arm of the British, interviews the former prime minister, who claims that it was Israel's strategic patience that paused to give Iran time to reconsider. You have analysts like Scott Ritter, Prof Mearsheimer, and people like Steve Bannon saying Trump had to step in to save Israel. Who is telling the truth?

Just remember that Netanyahu, on the first day of war, said that the war would last for 12 days. So, that should tell you everything you need to know.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top