Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Care to share where Oman has allowed Iran to manage its sovereign areas and waterways? If not, then please don't engage in circular arguments. Either you condemn the illegal trespassing and attacking sovereign countries in all its forms or you just say it out in open that you'll defend Iran legal and illegal attacks.

That is funny... Oman has and had no say. You think Oman always had a say?
The straits were open waterways....


Now everyone has a spine when Iran has controlled it...you cannot activate your sovereignty retrospectively at this point. And Iran is not claiming Omani part except saying that it is not safe until the war ends. Besides Iran wouldn't allow a third party aggressor to use that space regardless even if Oman is unable to enforce it's sovereignty over it.

 
Yanks started this war of choice on behalf of israel and killed their leaders along with 4000 innocent iranians at least, 15,000 bombs dropped on iran, as well as threatening iran's infrastructure which sustains a modern civilization, and damages reaching almost 1 trillion dollars, what do you expect iran to do? Roll out the red carpet in strait of hormuz?

Your are absolutely right - Iran must fight back as best and as hard as it can with all of its might. It must also be prepared for the other side to do the same.

After all, war is war.
 
That is funny... Oman has and had no say. You think Oman always had a say?
The straits were open waterways....


Now everyone has a spine when Iran has controlled it...you cannot activate your sovereignty retrospectively at this point. And Iran is not claiming Omani part except saying that it is not safe until the war ends. Besides Iran wouldn't allow a third party aggressor to use that space regardless even if Oman is unable to enforce it's sovereignty over it.


Thankyou for making it clear you gonna keep justifying the illegal attacks with your thoughts madeup as facts and NYT articles where Trump is making empty threats. You are speaking with such conviction and authority as if you were sitting with Sultan of Oman when they made a decision to bow infront of Trump and relinquished their authority over Hormuz. Please do better next time, don't mix-up your thoughts and personal opinions as a fact and if you gonna keep arguing about some made up fantasy where Oman bowed infront of trump. Let's stop it here. I was looking for facts which proves Iran has legal authority to manage Oman Jurisdiction whereas I was dragged into some NYT articles, trump threats and not a single thing on point or what I asked for. and I don't really wanna engage with personal analysis presented as matter of facts.
 
Thankyou for making it clear you gonna keep justifying the illegal attacks with your thoughts madeup as facts and NYT articles where Trump is making empty threats. You are speaking with such conviction and authority as if you were sitting with Sultan of Oman when they made a decision to bow infront of Trump and relinquished their authority over Hormuz. Please do better next time, don't mix-up your thoughts and personal opinions as a fact and if you gonna keep arguing about some made up fantasy where Oman bowed infront of trump. Let's stop it here. I was looking for facts which proves Iran has legal authority to manage Oman Jurisdiction whereas I was dragged into some NYT articles, trump threats and not a single thing on point or what I asked for. and I don't really wanna engage with personal analysis presented as matter of facts.

That write-up is way too emotional...


Let's read what the MoU says
Point
4 — Immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.

You gave pass to the belligerent in this case who threatened Oman and continues to use its space.
nice!
 
Your are absolutely right - Iran must fight back as best and as hard as it can with all of its might. It must also be prepared for the other side to do the same.

After all, war is war.
Yanks dropped so much bombs that they ran out of their strategic reserves, what more can these hillbillies do? Drop a nuke?

Dont let trump's bluster fool you, this is the limit of their conventional military might.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
That write-up is way too emotional...


Let's read what the MoU says
Point
4 — Immediately upon the signing of this MOU, the United States of America will begin the removal of its naval blockade and any disturbances or impediments against the Islamic Republic of Iran, and will fully end the naval blockade within 30 days. During this period, the traffic of vessels will be in proportion to the numbers of pre-war traffic being restored by the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America further undertakes to remove its forces from the proximity of the Islamic Republic of Iran within 30 days after the final deal.

You gave pass to the belligerent in this case who threatened Oman and continues to use its space.
nice!

Are you trying to interpret MOU as per your understanding? Because clearly it is not mentioned anywhere in MoU that Iran can or will manage Oman side of Hormuz?

But what is clearly mentioned is

"The text specifies that Iran will allow ships to safely pass toll-free for 60 days. Afterward, Iran is required to negotiate the waterway's future with Oman and other Gulf states"

It is a clear violation of MoU where Iran is trying to assert control of Hormuz before 60 days has passed to negotiate the control with Oman.
 
Are you trying to interpret MOU as per your understanding? Because clearly it is not mentioned anywhere in MoU that Iran can or will manage Oman side of Hormuz?
Exactly!!! You got the point! Oman is not a party to the MoU. It is between the belligerent and fhe aggrieved party. Where the belligerent caused a material change in the operation of a waterways. Oman's part was said out loud by orange. And I simply shared a politico article, not written by me, and the actual term... which is between US and Iran...
Oman and the gulf states are tertiary to this... meaning, until this is resolved between these two.
 
off topic posts will not be tolerated

and I remind users who find it difficult to co-exist here that a US perspective thread exists for you
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Iran attacks ships using Omani corridor and US rescinds general waiver on Iranian oil sales. MOU going well.

but this situation still suits Iran, since Iran exports oil regardless of waivers. only a US naval blockade changes this situation for Iran. and if Iran agreed to allow toll-free transit of the Strait for 60 days, then it is what it is.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top