Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's sort of relevant to know your previous positions on the matter, particularly when you start to accuse others of being devoid of facts and nuances. Don't you agree?
You do understand that you just wrote nonsense, right?
Oh, OK. Sorry, I didn't know that the US had one of the smallest armies in the world and relied on the pocket money from Arabs to survive, unlike Iraq in the 80s which had the biggest, most powerful army in the world with the world's bestest economy. OK lol
Has the agreement signed? Has the alliance been made official? It's better to comment when it happens.
I don't understand one thing about Pakistan's position. I mean there are obviously two scenarios in case of Iran:This is my last post on this.
Apologies, mods.
But don’t get so cocky.
Sooner or later - Hinduvta is coming for Pakistan again.
Worst case you’ll need a neutral Iran.
Get your military to focus on Hinduvta instead of fattening their Swiss bank accounts and mansions in US.
Please discuss this hereI don't understand one thing. And that's Pakistan's position.
I mean there are obviously two scenarios in case of Iran.
Scenario I: Iran wins the war and defeats the US. Then Iran's geopolitical position in the region gets even stronger than before. Then Pakistan who has helped Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will be neighbors with an Iran that will remember Pakistan's betrayal quite well. How does that serve Pakistan's long-term interests?
Scenario II: Iran loses the war and becomes another US vassal state, even if severely weakened after the war. A pro-Israel regime will take over Iran with the Iranian diaspora ruling over the new Iran. Then who do you think Iran will side with? Pakistan that formed alliances with its Arab enemies or pro-Israel India who also happens to have a much larger economy?
Pakistan is putting itself in a lose-lose situation with regard to Iran in the future.
It was my only post on the matter. I'm afraid I'm not that interested in Pakistan's issues to participate in another thread as well. We have more important things to worry about at the moment, such as the US continued aggressions and its possible plans of launching a ground invasion.Please discuss this here
Rent-a-state policies continue.
- Watandar
- Replies: 13
- Forum: Strategic & Foreign Affairs
That was a LIE. Nothing of the sort happened.
I don't understand one thing about Pakistan's position. I mean there are obviously two scenarios in case of Iran:
Scenario I: Iran wins the war and defeats the US. Then Iran's geopolitical position in the region gets even stronger than before. Then Pakistan who has helped Saudi Arabia and Kuwait will be neighbors with an Iran that will remember Pakistan's betrayal quite well. How does that serve Pakistan's long-term interests?
Scenario II: Iran loses the war and becomes another US vassal state, even if severely weakened after the war. A pro-Israel regime will take over Iran with the Iranian diaspora ruling over the new Iran. Then who do you think Iran will side with? Pakistan that formed alliances with its Arab enemies or pro-Israel India who also happens to have a much larger economy?
Pakistan is putting itself in a lose-lose situation with regard to Iran in the future. Pakistan could at least form a strong relationship with Iran and hope for Scenario I to come true.
I don't understand one thing about Pakistan's position
will remember Pakistan's betrayal quite well
do not panic , USA is just doing text book miltary tactic , nothing especially ... half of member of this forum would do the same so its high probably our commanders already made all these consideration ...I'd rather keep Khuzestan and Bushehr than the Strait of Hormuz which is not even entirely ours to begin with.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.