Shags101
Trusted Member
Trump has done this bit before and for the Iranians to say they never said anything will see what happens
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump has done this bit before and for the Iranians to say they never said anything will see what happens
Trump has done this bit before and for the Iranians to say they never said anything will see what happens
View attachment 209107
Qalibaf and Argachi and Pezeskhian have surrendered the country once more.
Iran’s leaders once again demonstrate they are clowns and they love being apart of Trump’s circus.
I don't get your pessimism. To me Trump has backed down yet again, for the 50th time. Frankly I think its Israel AND Iran who are playing him like a ping pong ball.View attachment 209107
Qalibaf and Argachi and Pezeskhian have surrendered the country once more.
Iran’s leaders once again demonstrate they are clowns and they love being apart of Trump’s circus.
That language ("future benefit of the WORLD") reminds me of BORДT!View attachment 209107
Qalibaf and Argachi and Pezeskhian have surrendered the country once more.
Iran’s leaders once again demonstrate they are clowns and they love being apart of Trump’s circus.
I don't get your pessimism. To me Trump has backed down yet again, for the 50th time. Frankly I think its Israel AND Iran who are playing him like a ping pong ball.
Trump will eventually accept his defeat.
you really want hundreds of common people to die, Iran has fought bravely up until now, but ultimate solution is negotiation and Peace. One bomb once fall near you and all your views will be changed. We must all prepare ourselves for future but at this stage continuous fighting without further addition to AD and missiles will cause only succideQalibaf and Argachi and Pezeskhian have surrendered the country once more.
Iran’s leaders once again demonstrate they are clowns and they love being apart of Trump’s circus
Strong words.. but I'll believe it when I see itEbrahim Rezaei, a member of Iran's Parliament National Security Commission, warned that if Iran is attacked, it will return the entire region and its infrastructure to the "Stone Age," adding, "It's in your interest not to do anything foolish."
I don´t think for a second the air campaign against Iran, if agreed to by those 2, would depend on the terrorists in Northern Iraq. If they were such an important element of toppling the government, they would have been better protected. That's what I think.There's no last minute peace deal.
Possibly Iran has hit the Kurdish insurgents so hard last night that they have told Trump they wouldn't launch their ground operations, or Trump needs more time to coordinate his attack for another shock and awe.
The attack is certain in my opinion. Both Trump and Netanyahu have agreed on this.
Even those reformists knows that Irán will never be back being the Islamic Republic.What makes you think Iran are surrendering?
Give them credit where it is due. Iran is reviewing the proposal while simultaneously launching drone strikes in Erbil and Kuwait. They may have been passive at first, but they have clearly raised the stakes and showed more initiative to strike first. Ultimately, even a massive military campaign by Trump won't reopen the Strait of Hormuz. He needs to accept that he is backed into a submission, and he is not breaking this arm lock.
5K-10K is large enough to cause distraction, particularly if the nature of this distraction is separatism. They want to stretch our forces thin. It's not that hard to understand how they can be useful.I don´t think for a second the air campaign against Iran, if agreed to by those 2, would depend on the terrorists in Northern Iraq. If they were such an important element of toppling the government, they would have been better protected. That's what I think.
Their numbers just aren't there.
I agree, but this war is different than that war. That was a full on land/air war. Mostly land. This is a missile-war, if we can call it that. The US hasn't gathered 50k infantry or something, it's their total force posture as I understand. Meaning the full amount of troops officialy in the region, at the beginning of the war. That includes all of those troops from abandoned bases in hotels etc.5K-10K is large enough to cause distraction, particularly if the nature of this distraction is separatism. They want to stretch our forces thin. It's not that hard to understand how they can be useful.
Kurdistan of Iran temporarily fell to the hands of the separatists during the Iraq-Iran war, even though they were not even half as powerful as they're now, and it was a major distraction for our forces, even though both the Iraqis and the Kurds were fighting us in the west of the country. Now imagine the US attacks us from the south and the Kurds distract us in the west.
The US has gathered around 50K forces. They won't attack us from only one direction with barely 50K forces.
Don't be so particular about the truth. You’ve bought into the bullshit from Trump, Hegseth, and the Pentagon Ranch from minute one.Strong words.. but I'll believe it when I see it
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.