Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds
- Thread starter Khorasan Black Flags
- Start date
Persian Gulf
INT'L MOD
GWXP
Registered Member
Possibly, the nuclear archive of the Project AMAD, that Mossad stole from the warehouse in Tehran was an intentional leak by Iran - in the end who keeps nuclear archives in poorly guarded warehouses in Tehran.
The aim of the leak was to show to Israel how advanced Iranian nuclear program was in 1999-2003.
Possibly, these recent classified files about the Israeli nuclear program, is also an intentional leak by Israel.
Maybe Israel want to show something to Iran?
The aim of the leak was to show to Israel how advanced Iranian nuclear program was in 1999-2003.
Possibly, these recent classified files about the Israeli nuclear program, is also an intentional leak by Israel.
Maybe Israel want to show something to Iran?
Khorasan Black Flags
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #5,555
Iranian Missiles Hit Strategic Israeli Facilities / "We Cannot Destroy Iran's Nuclear Program"
A Hebrew-language media outlet, acknowledging the success of Iran’s “True Promise-2” operation, wrote that Tel Aviv is unable to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.
According to ISNA, an Israeli author discussed the challenges the Zionist regime's military would face in attempting to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities and explained the reasons behind it.
Amir Rapaport, a military analyst at the Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon, claimed that “the Israeli army has the capability to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities,” but “it cannot completely eliminate Iran’s nuclear program—especially the uranium enrichment sites.”
In this context, Rapaport wrote that Iran’s enrichment facilities are now “spread across about 10 sites, some located deep within mountains at elevations around 4 kilometers, making them extremely difficult to target from the air.”
He recalled the Stuxnet cyberattack in 2010, attributed to Mossad and other Western entities, which temporarily disabled centrifuges but failed to prevent Iranians from developing more robust security measures.
Rapaport also pointed out that Iran is 80 times larger than “Israel” and stretches to the plains of Afghanistan, making effective aerial operations extremely challenging.
He added, “Uranium enrichment cannot be entirely stopped through bombing alone.”
The author also described Iran’s missile strike on October 1, 2024, as “a strategic success for Iran,” noting that hundreds of ballistic missiles were launched, some of which penetrated Israeli defense systems despite the intervention of an international coalition led by the United States, hitting strategic facilities.
He continued, “The Iranians then demonstrated—to themselves and to others—their capability to carry out direct attacks on Israel,” and noted the possibility that some of the missiles were equipped with technologies capable of bypassing Israel’s Arrow missile defense systems.
According to Rapaport, Iran “still has the capacity to threaten Israel.”
He emphasized that “Israel is experiencing a moment of weakness due to declining relations with the United States and domestic political failures.”
He referred to a “dangerous political situation,” pointing out that countries allied with Israel—such as Canada and Singapore—may support the formation of a Palestinian state at the upcoming international conference in New York. This would make it harder to ensure an international coalition to defend Tel Aviv, as occurred on the night of October 1, 2024, and would complicate securing a “green light” from the U.S. and its allies for a retaliatory strike.
This report comes as the region witnesses escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, amid Israeli threats to bomb nuclear sites and fears in Tel Aviv over a potential U.S.-Iran agreement in the ongoing indirect negotiations—an agreement that would fall short of fully halting Iran’s uranium enrichment, contrary to the desires of the zionist regime.
A Hebrew-language media outlet, acknowledging the success of Iran’s “True Promise-2” operation, wrote that Tel Aviv is unable to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program.
According to ISNA, an Israeli author discussed the challenges the Zionist regime's military would face in attempting to destroy Iran’s nuclear facilities and explained the reasons behind it.
Amir Rapaport, a military analyst at the Israeli newspaper Makor Rishon, claimed that “the Israeli army has the capability to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities,” but “it cannot completely eliminate Iran’s nuclear program—especially the uranium enrichment sites.”
In this context, Rapaport wrote that Iran’s enrichment facilities are now “spread across about 10 sites, some located deep within mountains at elevations around 4 kilometers, making them extremely difficult to target from the air.”
He recalled the Stuxnet cyberattack in 2010, attributed to Mossad and other Western entities, which temporarily disabled centrifuges but failed to prevent Iranians from developing more robust security measures.
Rapaport also pointed out that Iran is 80 times larger than “Israel” and stretches to the plains of Afghanistan, making effective aerial operations extremely challenging.
He added, “Uranium enrichment cannot be entirely stopped through bombing alone.”
The author also described Iran’s missile strike on October 1, 2024, as “a strategic success for Iran,” noting that hundreds of ballistic missiles were launched, some of which penetrated Israeli defense systems despite the intervention of an international coalition led by the United States, hitting strategic facilities.
He continued, “The Iranians then demonstrated—to themselves and to others—their capability to carry out direct attacks on Israel,” and noted the possibility that some of the missiles were equipped with technologies capable of bypassing Israel’s Arrow missile defense systems.
According to Rapaport, Iran “still has the capacity to threaten Israel.”
He emphasized that “Israel is experiencing a moment of weakness due to declining relations with the United States and domestic political failures.”
He referred to a “dangerous political situation,” pointing out that countries allied with Israel—such as Canada and Singapore—may support the formation of a Palestinian state at the upcoming international conference in New York. This would make it harder to ensure an international coalition to defend Tel Aviv, as occurred on the night of October 1, 2024, and would complicate securing a “green light” from the U.S. and its allies for a retaliatory strike.
This report comes as the region witnesses escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, amid Israeli threats to bomb nuclear sites and fears in Tel Aviv over a potential U.S.-Iran agreement in the ongoing indirect negotiations—an agreement that would fall short of fully halting Iran’s uranium enrichment, contrary to the desires of the zionist regime.
vmro
Registered Member
So International agency could be rebranded in Iranian agency, they will still be IAEA... so, with eventual deal they gonna be unemployed and unimportant...
this is conflict of interest even in New York goddammit...
this is conflict of interest even in New York goddammit...
FUB
Trusted Member
Here we go again
www.jpost.com
Iran carried out implosion tests for nuclear weapons development | The Jerusalem Post
A new IAEA report reveals Iran carried out undeclared nuclear tests, prompting calls to refer the case to the UN Security Council. Much of the IAEA report is based on evidence from the Mossad.
www.jpost.com
FUB
Trusted Member
Mr.Putin said, no one can compete with US propaganda. TP2 was a lot more successful than people are deceived to believe . The cell phone videos uploaded showed 30-40 missile strikes in one instance.
muhammed45
Elite Member
When you tell reformist dumbfucks like Zibakalam mofo, these guys from IAEA and other so called international orgs are only collecting data for Mossad and CIA, they respond with their rear legs.
Look at his words, oh man! Half a mile underground. Damn we cannot target them, they are unreachable.
Khatami gave every detail of our scientists to IAEA terrorists and they leaked the info to western intelligence agencies.
ShapurII
Trusted Member
We are in the current situation because of Khatami and Rohani in the period of 2003-2004. They confessed to multiple violations of the NPT like plutonium reprocessing, neutron initiators, etc.
I remember Rohani said that the case of PMD had been closed permanently. It seems open and on the table to me
BigMela2onin
Trusted Member
What is the point of statements like this? Everyone already knows. Are you hoping EU citizens will complain do something when they have zero say in their government's foreign policy?
They could use this as well as US refusal of enrichement rights as justification for withdrawing from NPT but they never do.
Will they announce secret documents revealing US and EU participation in the Gaza genocide next?
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
-
-
-
-
-
Al - Haider VT-4 MBT - The Premier PA Ground Asset [Developments] (3 Viewers)
- Latest: RandomThoughts7
Country Watch Latest
-
-
-
-
India Moves to Join France’s FCAS Sixth-Generation Fighter Programme After Germany’s Exit (16 Viewers)
- Latest: Death_Zone
-
Latest Posts
-
-
-
-
At least 14 newborn babies killed after fire breaks out in Pakistan hospital (29 Viewers)- Latest: Mobius
-