Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

VCheng said:
So why should not Iran do the same and persist in its quest to get such weapons too? That is the point considering that it was advised above to Iran to simply give that up.
Click to expand...
Iran should get it and for whatever reason, they're not getting it and even giving Fatwa against it.

So either get it or just totally give up everything remotely linked to the nuclear program, even if its peaceful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TAC
tman786 said:
Trigger warning

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Bastard. I wish I could crucify this man myself.

I cannot believe what I just saw.
 
gambit said:
So far, no one have adequately explain what is Iran's needs for %60 enrichment of U-235. The fact that none came forth only adds suspicion and further support the belief that the US/Israel air strikes were necessary.
Click to expand...
That is simple
Its bargaining chip . In jcpoa Iran agreed on a much lower level of enrichment. it was usa that left the deal and began imposing sanction .
In these round of negotiation iran also stated that it's open to the discussion on the level of enrichment and protocol that put in place to make sure the program won't deviate . But not to zero enrichment in Iran.


It was USA that was not interested in an agreement.

gambit said:
Under the current NPT terms, I do not need centrifuges. I can get %5 enrichment for energy from the international community.
Click to expand...
Under current not agreement Iran is entitled to 10% of eurodif production . How much Iran get?
Where was that NPT protocol when tehran research reactor were running out of fuel ?who gave us fuel for the reactor. We had to enrich the uranium to 20% ourself and master the fuel production for it to keep the reactor working and avoid a disaster for more than 1 million of Iranian patients whom their only option for survival and treatment was that reactor.


So please stop that nonsense it has zero buyer here.

gambit said:
Aircraft carriers
- Submarines
- Missiles

Currently, only those three items can use %90 enriched U-235. We know Iran do not have aircraft carriers and subs that requires long duration energy sources, aka nuclear reactors. That remains nuclear weapons or item 3. Am sure YOU are logical person.
Click to expand...
Not only those you can build a research reactor to use more than 90% enriched uranium . You must be aware of it after all you yourself built one of those reactors for us.
 

Iraq arrests commentator over online post on Iran-Israel war​


Iraqi authorities have said they arrested a political commentator over a post alleging that a military radar system struck by a drone had been used to help Israel in its war against Iran, AFP reports.

The court issued a warrant against him for posting content online that included “incitement intended to insult and defame the security institution”.

In a post on X, which was later deleted but has circulated on social media as a screenshot, Ardawi told his more than 90,000 followers that “a French radar in the Taji base served the Israeli aggression” and was eliminated.

The Iraqi defence ministry said that Ardawi’s arrest was made on the instructions of the prime minister, who also serves as the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, “not to show leniency towards anyone who endangers the security and stability of the country”.

-------------------------------------------------------------

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Meengla said:
And 'ask yourself': If Israel was that successful then why they have agreed to the ceasefire?
I think you got it backward.
Click to expand...
Zion obviously doesn't want one and they don't need one. It's the US due to its international standing that has forced both countries onto the ceasefire.

At the end of the day, it was Iran's foreign minister who repeatedly said that Iran will agree to the ceasefire if Zion stops the attacks. Zion on the other hand took a fair bit persuading.

Look, Zion's air defence systems, radars, missile systems, nuclear sites, etc. haven't been attacked except a handful. Iran wasn't able to impose a no fly zone over the skies of Zion.
 
Arash said:
This guy didn't understand shit.
Iran Initiallt fired many missiles, however once the Iron Dome fell their number dropped as Iran focused only on key targets along using both missiles and drones. There was no need for overwhelming missile assaults.
Click to expand...

Iron Dome cannot intercept BMs. It was made for cheap rockets and artillery by Hamas and HZ.

Why people keep saying Iron Dome everywhere when it’s not a defense against ballistic missiles. That job goes to Arrrow 2/3, David’s Sling, PAC, and THAAD
 
Ali_Baba said:
It just requires an additional assembly line to be setup, the plan was to have 50/year but that was cut back down to lack of orders, etc. Iran needs to work out what a modern air force looks like before purchasing. Iran is geographically a big country, so a platform like the J10CE may be more useful for them than the JF17C which is more short legged. The J-35AE is also of critical importance for them because with the stealth jets, Iran can roam Iraq and Syria and take out the air to air refuellers themselves directly which means that the IAF cannot operate over Iran at all. Iran will need area defence of high value areas, so there is a role for the JF17C if that is the direction that they want to go.

Su-35 may still have value for Iran due to its long range, but the Su57 would be better. However, I suspect Iran has finally worked out that Russia will not work to give Iran any military advantage over Israel due to "so many Russian speakers in Israel now"..

Interms of politics, and optics, it would be far better for FC1 to come from China, than Pakistan as Pakistan can be pressured to stop supplies. China cant as easily.
Click to expand...


China have its own interests as well, so does Pakistan. I believe it would be best for Iran if it have 5 squadrons of JF-17 block 3, and 5 squadrons of J-10c. Total 160-180 planes. And in edition, maybe 2 squadrons of J-35.

Iran should not buy only J-10c or only JF-17 III. Just my opinion.

Also, the low range of JF-17 III (still 800 km) can be complemented by Ariel refuelers and drop tanks. And to be frank, Iran don't need it's fighters to go after Israeli refuelers (because we saw in this conflict, they had 40+ refuelers at their disposal). No matter how many refuelers Iran destroy, they will still have sufficient. So it's okay to have a fighter jet which is capable of BVR, can give a good punch and reduce the weapons load of enemy fighters (Israeli fighters were not carrying BVRs while attacking Iran because they were not expecting any reaction. Only drop load of bombs. But if they have to plan for Iranian aiforce fleet as well. This would mean they will carry BVRs + WVRs + bombs. So less bombs per sortie. JF-17 even there, achieved 30-40% of its objectives.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 196 (members: 9, guests: 187)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top