Um your entire "economics" argument is based on the fact that Iran gets to fire its missiles and Israel only gets to intercept those missile with more expensive missiles, hence they will loose the "economics" war.
It’s not just economics, it’s also supply. You seem to think that there are an infinite amount of interceptor missiles. And you seem to also think that the shield will not collapse (99% success rate forever) and Israel will not lose any radars or air defense systems which you cannot “replace” that easily. These are systems that cost billions of dollars.
But you do not account for the fact, the other side will retaliate too, and in the absence similar air defence capabilities, will leed due huge losses on the ground for Iran.
Iran’s missiles are stored in mountain underground facilities. If you bothered to do one bit of research you will realize destroying Iran’s missile program isn’t that easy. During this recent attack, Iran didn’t use even use its silos and exclusively used TELS. It didn’t use Hypersonics or it’s higher cost missiles either.
Israel cannot even fully stop Hamas rockets 6 months later. And Hezbollah rockets/drones/guided munitions are striking with impunity in the North (18 soldiers seriously wounded yesterday alone). Yet they are going to stop Iranian missiles from 1500KM away in one of the biggest land masses in the Middle East?
Sure bud
Lets assume your numbers are correct(which they are not).
Prove they are not that. Rather than just talk hot air. You clearly have demonstrated up to this point you have no clue what you are talking about.
Lets assume Iran fires 100 ballistics missiles on Israel, each costing $500,000. Israel fires 100 Arrow interceptors $63 million each. All of the missiles are intercepted and there are no losses on the ground.
So Iran spent $50 Million, Israel spent 6.3 Billion.
And where are you going to get the next 100 Arrow 3? You realize Arrow 3 is a ballistic missile with a seeker, right? What an absurd scenario where nothing gets thru and “no losses on the ground”. That’s your “realistic scenario”.
You think that there is this endless supply of interceptors and it just doesn’t work that way.
But when Israel fires back lets say 100 missiles or 100 bombs from airplanes
Israel has a limited amount of Jericho II & III missiles as they are nuclear deterrent. Not made for conventional warfare in such numbers.
And “bombs by airplanes”, Israel would need to refuel to Iran and back to even do this. Yeah I’m sure Iran won’t notice 70 fighter jets flying towards it.
What a realistic scenario Iran fires 100 missiles nothing gets thru and Israel flies to Iran and destroys all the missiles
to bomb critical infrastructure in Iran,
And what infrastructure is that?
and there is nothing there to intercept them.
Oh so Iran now has no air defenses in your wrapped mind. Clearly you have zero clue and your opinion is worth less than the dirt under an IDF soldiers boot.
Your credibility is next to nothing at this point with your absurd scenarios. Looking at your account it’s clear why. Shocking to see another random Indian who kisses Israeli ass when they don’t even like your country.
