FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
I understand and know we have accepted that it’s a hobbyist model, I just shared it again as a place holder for what could be, and to say we just need an improved design for the modern era. Basically everything the JF-17 Block 3 has could be ported over to a new airframe and we would have the benefits of a Gripen NG for a little more than the price of a JF-17 Block 3, if economies of scale and sales are taken into account.You know this JF-20 was a hobby-modeller's what-if project to play around with some ideas? Nothing official nor real.
The Turkish single engine T-FX design seems a way better design to pursue and has some R&D Design work already done. Probably an additional good way for our 200 engineers in Turkey to work with the Turks on a design that can benefit from KAAN development. Turkey has a lot of experience building the fuselage for the F-35, so a lower RCS airframe that is optimized for high speed A2A; no DSI, could be just what we need to deal with the entire current and expected IAF line up.
Semi-stealth, like the KF-21, but in large numbers maybe just what we need for form the backbone of the future PAF fleet. Also, if we build in a loyal wingman version, it could be a plane we could also sell at a competitive price.
We need to maximize the potential of the new WS-19 engines, and as everyone keeps pointing out the JF-17 airframe has reached the limits of its design with the current engines. Everyone says a 30-50% increase in thrust from 81kn to 110-120 kn is too much of a leap for the current airframe.
Last edited:






