New smaller provinces or administrative units are the real devolution of power and progress

imadul

Elite Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2007
Messages
4,441
Reaction score
6,742
Reputation
1,192.9
Country of Origin
Country of Residence
It was Mohsin Naqvi or whose voice was that, system is done and dusted.
instead of talking about the breakneck speed AI is developing and Anthropic, Google, Meta talking about slowing down the progress, Pakistan still searching for clean water, affordable power and just comfortable mode of transportation.

Smaller provinces, power and finance devolved at city level are the right way to go. Are the powers that be are serious or it is just a diversion?
There is no single problem, there are many, people always conflate many things together.
Need both a holistic view and granular view about serious problems.
 
Source:
Current affairs popular topic
You could have 100 provinces and Pakistan still wont progress an inch in a 100 years.
You have any work to show for such profound statement? Pakistan has progressed enormously in 80 years.
e.g.
Life expectancy at birth was 32 years in 1947. It is 68 in 2025.
Infant mortality was 25% in 1947, it is 5% in 2025.
Literacy was 16% it is 63% in 2025.
Per capita income in 1947 was $100. It is $1,700 in 2025.
 
You have any work to show for such profound statement? Pakistan has progressed enormously in 80 years.
e.g.
Life expectancy at birth was 32 years in 1947. It is 68 in 2025.
Infant mortality was 25% in 1947, it is 5% in 2025.
Literacy was 16% it is 63% in 2025.
Per capita income in 1947 was $100. It is $1,700 in 2025.

Oh bhai. Bangladesh per capita reached 3000 USD.

Pakistan is gonna stay exactly where it is.
 
You have any work to show for such profound statement? Pakistan has progressed enormously in 80 years.
e.g.
Life expectancy at birth was 32 years in 1947. It is 68 in 2025.
Infant mortality was 25% in 1947, it is 5% in 2025.
Literacy was 16% it is 63% in 2025.
Per capita income in 1947 was $100. It is $1,700 in 2025.
A better comparison is
Pakistan and China per capital income.
1960 is the earlier available data
  • Pakistan: $82 per capita
  • China: $90 per capita
2024 - 2026
  • Pakistan (2024): $1,578 per capita
  • China (2024): $13,453 per capita
Tells the whole story.

 
Oh bhai. Bangladesh per capita reached 3000 USD.

Pakistan is gonna stay exactly where it is.
What brilliant logic: Bangladesh does better so Pakistan will remain exactly where it is. If somebody else has a faster car, my car is broken and can't run!
 
You have any work to show for such profound statement? Pakistan has progressed enormously in 80 years.
e.g.
Life expectancy at birth was 32 years in 1947. It is 68 in 2025.
Infant mortality was 25% in 1947, it is 5% in 2025.
Literacy was 16% it is 63% in 2025.
Per capita income in 1947 was $100. It is $1,700 in 2025.
Do you know what the global averages are for these metrics? Nevermind that of developed nations?

Per capita income is a sham. Life expectancy and mortality have improved as a consequence of medical progress globally and we are well positioned to take benefit from global benefits. We are not Sierra Leone lol.

This is typical bureaucrat babu thinking, stats in a vacuum.

If you're running with 10 people, and those 10 have lapped you, but you are still moving at snail's pace, then it doesn't mean you are still progressing. The reality check has to come some time.
 
Do you know what the global averages are for these metrics? Nevermind that of developed nations?

Per capita income is a sham. Life expectancy and mortality have improved as a consequence of medical progress globally and we are well positioned to take benefit from global benefits. We are not Sierra Leone lol.

This is typical bureaucrat babu thinking, stats in a vacuum.

If you're running with 10 people, and those 10 have lapped you, but you are still moving at snail's pace, then it doesn't mean you are still progressing. The reality check has to come some time.
You are saying Pakistan has not developed as much as other countries. But OP is saying it is at standstill. There is a difference between not fast enough and not moving.
 
You are saying Pakistan has not developed as much as other countries. But OP is saying it is at standstill. There is a difference between not fast enough and not moving.
Some (Western) experts claim that Pakistan's progress is actually real but it is absorbed by its ever growing population.
 
Do you know what the global averages are for these metrics? Nevermind that of developed nations?

Per capita income is a sham. Life expectancy and mortality have improved as a consequence of medical progress globally and we are well positioned to take benefit from global benefits. We are not Sierra Leone lol.

This is typical bureaucrat babu thinking, stats in a vacuum.

If you're running with 10 people, and those 10 have lapped you, but you are still moving at snail's pace, then it doesn't mean you are still progressing. The reality check has to come some time.
Per capital makes sense in relation

For example, Pakistan and China per capit income.

1960 is the earliest available data
  • Pakistan: $82 per capita
  • China: $90 per capita
2024 - 2026
  • Pakistan (2024): $1,578 per capita
  • China (2024): $13,453 per capita
 
We keep going in circles because every time we discuss Pakistan’s problems, we stop halfway, we name the issues but avoid the real solutions. After nearly eight decades, it’s clear that simply creating more provinces is not a solution on its own. Without deep structural reforms, administrative reshuffling becomes cosmetic. In the short term, introducing federal‑level administrative units through constitutional amendments could help, but even that is only a bridge, not the destination.

Pakistan’s core challenge is not geography, it’s the entrenched elite structure. A small group of powerful families controls an enormous share of agricultural land, often estimated between 40% and 50%. They influence politics, law enforcement, markets, and even local governance. Laws exist, but implementation collapses because those who benefit from the current system have the power to block change. This isn’t just a political issue; it’s a mindset issue.

What’s even more frustrating is the negativity that comes from many Pakistanis living abroad. They enjoy systems that give them opportunities, stability, and fairness, things they would never have received back home. Yet when you talk to them about reforming Pakistan, they dismiss it as impossible. Why? If other nations can transform themselves, why can’t we?

China did it through long‑term planning.
Bangladesh is quietly becoming a manufacturing powerhouse.
Singapore is decades ahead because it built institutions that actually work.
The UAE and Saudi Arabia are reinventing themselves through bold economic reforms.
Vietnam, Malaysia, and Indonesia have surged past Pakistan in growth and governance.
Even Ethiopia, despite its challenges, is outperforming Pakistan economically.

So the question isn’t whether Pakistan can become an economic hub. It absolutely can. The country has strategic geography, a young population, natural resources, and massive untapped potential. The real question is whether Pakistan is willing to confront the structural barriers that keep it stuck.

To move forward, Pakistan needs long‑term vision, not five‑year political cycles. The government should be working with 200‑year development plans, broken down into clear milestones: institutional reform, land reform, industrialization, education modernization, and governance restructuring. Without this kind of long‑term commitment, we’ll keep repeating the same debates for another 79 years.
What I have shared from governance to tax collection, and from land reform to universal education & Healthcare programs under 34 EZ model. Pakistani establishment with all its power & top economists, will never ever be able to match that. Take another 25 years discussing it, even Nepal & Bhutan will be ahead of Pakistan.
 
You are saying Pakistan has not developed as much as other countries. But OP is saying it is at standstill. There is a difference between not fast enough and not moving.
A quadriplegic on a wheel chair moves as well. No disrespect for the disabled intended.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top