Pakistan Rocket Force Command News and Discussions

ome harop drones to hit radars first on the 10th
can we some evidence pls , no radars were hit
no defense
ask the jeets that carried on the bombing how it feels to get touched by a 13 foot dildo up the ass




**** of jeet this is for PA ARFC not your cope chamber
Indians will continue to to keep water treaty on Ice
there will.no more conflict in South Asia..
oh there will be with how you are threatning our waters , i am just salivating at the juicy economical targets we can hit
we have nothing to lose but have u have alot
 
Pretty good video:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This guy takes so long to get there , also if you read any thread on this forum you have more information than this guy….. and Finally the English is so hard , big words …. It’s tiering.

KV
 
Pakistan’s nuclear doctrine has been dated and confirmed by the fact that there is space for limited conflict staying conventional.

While during conventional conflicts, what eventually revealed was that Pakistan could hold its own and control of the escalation ladder. The Indians jumped up the ladder too quickly that exposed the limited options they had. (One doesn’t fire Brahmos a nuclear capable missile so early in the conflict)

The Pakistan side has found its shortcomings and closing this gap with fielding conventional rocket space, subsonic, supersonic, hypersonic vectors, in numbers. Eventually, this closes the space that Indians wanted to conduct deep strikes within Pakistan as they see fit. Attacking Pakistan through the air, and you got PAF. Attacking through land or via ALBM through standoff ranges and you got the Rocket Force in numbers and with ranges targeting economic centers. The Navy seems to be the weak link but even that arm is fielding missiles in numbers and ranges enough to keep their counterparts at bay.

The challenge for Pakistan is to technically keep the limited conflict and excel in that theatre. An all out war is a very remote possibility in my opinion as the adversary has too much to lose.

Taking a macro view, modern wars are not about losing or winning. They are fought within the prism of diplomacy. Pakistan in swift retort and marka e haq achieved a diplomatic victory and its narrative was furthered on the world stage as opposed to its adversary.

But there are still some pains Pakistan has to endure (IWT suspension) that it will need an answer to, eventually.
 
Last edited:
Pakistan’s nuclear doctrine has been dated and confirmed by the fact that there is space for limited conflict staying conventional.

What eventually revealed was that Pakistan held its own and was well in control of the escalation ladder. The Indians jumped up the ladder too quickly exposing the limited options they had.

The Pakistan side has found its shortcomings in fielding conventional rocket space, subsonic, supersonic, hypersonic vectors in numbers. They are in progress of closing this gap.

Taking a macro view, modern wars are not about losing or winning. They are fought within the prism of diplomacy. Pakistan in swift retort and marka e haq achieved a diplomatic victory and its narrative was furthered on the world stage as opposed to its adversary.

But there are still some pains Pakistan has to endure (IWT suspension) that it will need an answer to, eventually.
Biggest issue for both Pakistan and India is that redline border is not even 1 km. If anyone of the country decides and goes suicidal mode than both Pakistan and India won't survive regardless of several trillion dollar India holds. Border distance is main difference.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Back
Top