MMM-E
Elite Member
- Jul 6, 2017
- 14,674
- 12,904
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, not to post too much which can be misread in several ways, it is a tremendous achievement in fact i never expected that soon As such I admit I was wrong and surely it is a most interesting & promising type ... BUT!
And now still my concerns: If you look at some posts here or within the social media circus, Kaan is already portrayed as "the ruler of the sky"!, comparable if not better - in most cases since larger - than the F-22, Su-57 and J-20 and that's my point! My stance is to take emotions a bit lower and rationale higher!
As much it is a promising program, my fear is, it is too much ... in its current form it is comparable to the J-20 demonstrator "2001" flown first in 2011. It too is powered by too weak interim engines and most of all it is yet still more an empty shell, just a technical demonstrator, a prototype.
Therefore I expect several changes to be incorporated within the development process which surely will take time, will maybe face some setbacks and most of all to reach the desired goals, it requires a true high-performance engine. And that's my point ... assembling parts for Western companies like GE and manufacturing certain ones since years is one story, to have the whole technical package together in one hand alone and developing a mature, reliable engine is another story and therefore comparisons to all so far done work on certain technical aspects, technologies or small engines for UAVs and trainer is TOTALLY different to a high-end, high-thrust engine in the class of 160+ kN!
And here I simply think, some should scale down their hopes to a realistic level otherwise they will be desperately disappointed.
Let's see and hope ...
assembling parts for Western companies like GE and manufacturing certain ones since years is one story, to have the whole technical package together in one hand alone and developing a mature, reliable engine is another story and therefore comparisons to all so far done work on certain technical aspects, technologies or small engines for UAVs and trainer is TOTALLY different to a high-end, high-thrust engine in the class of 160+ kN!
...
When we increase the diameter of the TF-10.000 engine by 30 cm, it will have a power effect of 35,000 lbf
same technology if we develop TF-10.000 Engine , there will not be a big deal to develop 35.000 lbf Engine
...
Raw thrust figures isn't everything. If it is, we should all start strapping airliner high bypass turbofans on fighters, our comparatively puny and light figher would ascend to hypersonic speeds.Is the F-15EX underpowered?
Isn't the GE F110 comparable to a WS-10?
How many production in service J-20s with WS-15s are there?
Yes Ideally there would be more thrust, but for now I think KAAN gets the job done. Its not like they are expecting it to be dogfighting with full afterburners. Not sure where that extra bit of thrust would be factored in, in BVR battles atleast. Its faster than the F-35 If I'm not mistaken, which has arguably the best 5th gen engine in the world.
And this post alone clearly shows, YOU HAVE NO CLUE AT ALL OF WHAT YOU SPEAK!
As if just enlarging the diameter of an engine by 30cm would be easy to make out of an 10,000 lbf engine one that can provide 35,000 lbf.
There you have it folks.Not me
General Manager of TEI Prof MAHMUT AKSIT say this
read again
When we increase the diameter of the TF-10.000 engine by 30 cm, it will have a power effect of 35,000 lbf
He worked as Consultant Research Engineer, Senior Researcher, Static Seals Manager and finally Advanced Seals Research Team Leader at General Electric Corporate R&D Center for 10 years in USA
and now He rules TUSAS Engine Industries Inc. (TEI)
View attachment 21961
Right now a drag chute is housed in the central nacelle. Not sure if this is going to continue. Maybe they'd want a radar there, not sure. Moving the engines apart is likely a decision to increase the main internal weapons bay size.The rear side of the KAAN looks huge and reminds me of SU-57 of the Russian Air Force. Not sure what the drawdowns might be @JamD
Raw thrust figures isn't everything. If it is, we should all start strapping airliner high bypass turbofans on fighters, our comparatively puny and light figher would ascend to hypersonic speeds.
When you go on wikipedia, and you see an engine have a maximum thrust of xxx Newtons or pound force, that does not speak the full picture. The actual thrust produced by the engine varies very significantly depending on the environment such as altitude, humidity, tempereture, as well as the speed of the aircraft itself, and that's before we even start talking about fuel consumption rate.
The problem with "third-generation" turbofans like F-110, AL-31, F-414s, WS-10 etc, is that it is not designed to sustain prolonged supersonic flight, their efficiency and produced thrust without afterburner decreases sharply as the aircraft enters transonic and supersonic ranges. This is where "fourth-generation" engines like F-119, AL-41(debatable), WS-15 comes in, they have much more powerful gas generators (or the part that actually does the fuel burning) with less "bypass" (or just fan), which enables them to have much greater thrust without afterburners, which pushes the 4th gen aircraft into prolonged, efficient, supersonic flight (hence supercruise)
Fun fact, F-119 and F-135 have the same "gas generator", and F-135 gets more thrust simply by having a bigger diameter, or rather, bigger "fan", and that's enough for F-35 which is designed to operate primarily in subsonic ranges anyway.
Not me
General Manager of TEI Prof MAHMUT AKSIT say this
read again
When we increase the diameter of the TF-10.000 engine by 30 cm, it will have a power effect of 35,000 lbf
He worked as Consultant Research Engineer, Senior Researcher, Static Seals Manager and finally Advanced Seals Research Team Leader at General Electric Corporate R&D Center for 10 years in USA
and now He rules TUSAS Engine Industries Inc. (TEI) which developed TS-1400 turboshaft Engine within 7 years
Other Counries develops same Engine in 15 years
View attachment 21961
We all know it is difficult to build a 35.000 lb engine. I think Mahmut Faruk Akşit said that to put it in a simple way. He is one of the 5 most successful managers working in the defense industry in Turkey.And this post alone clearly shows, YOU HAVE NO CLUE AT ALL OF WHAT YOU SPEAK!
As if just enlarging the diameter of an engine by 30cm would be easy to make out of an 10,000 lbf engine one that can provide 35,000 lbf.