- Feb 19, 2023
- 9,139
- 11,111
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
well there is also the Asian world and the world as well... so what?There is still the Arab world..mind you!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
well there is also the Asian world and the world as well... so what?There is still the Arab world..mind you!
Well.. Khalid Ibn Walid will disagree with that statement..They integrated into Arab culture yes, their training was steppe based fast moving cavalry which was alien to Arab military culture. It was the primary reasons the Mongols were beaten in open battle, something which was considered impossible by many.
They were trained by elder Mamluks for generations.
I guess arbas think cutting ties with Israel is war or stop selling them water and take us war, then that's what I wantYou just want war..you must have a violent personalty then..
I guess you don't read your posts..well there is also the Asian world and the world as well... so what?
Where is the Arab worldwell there is also the Asian world and the world as well... so what?
This where both of us disagree
Eastern and Western block both claim victory but fact is eygptians never gained any significant territory lost more soldiers and equipment and went back on all of its commitments on negotiation table as per Arab League, OIC and PLF them selves "stabbed us in the back" giving up Palestine and golan heights for ever for Sinai which was never Israel actual objective anyway
If this is busting the trend then God help us
Tactical victories don't matter..end result matter. Isrealis have no interest in occupying Lebanon so wrecking it or capturing it both workswhat you think is a victory is irrelevant, these are undoubtedly tactical military victories. please learn what that means before you criticise it
ask @The SCWhere is the Arab world
I do see Saudis eygptians and emiratis but no Arabs
I read every post, you are confused and not making any points.I guess you don't read your posts..
I can ridicule the Iranian army if you want.. stop trolling..
Now that is very very odd way of looking at things ..I would have thought stating Israel did better being the smaller force and ahould have actually more mortality and lossesPer capita the Israeli losses were more severe in both men and equipment against the Egyptians.....They held 1,200 sq KM of the Sinai and the Israeli situation on their side of the canal was weak. Yes they did cross over and establish their presence on the Egyptian side but my post is aimed your above assertions.
The rest regarding the negotiations and giving in too easily is right.
the issue is you are not defining 'end result' in military terms.Tactical victories don't matter..end result matter.
you are wrong. they occupied south Lebanon for 18 years from 1982 and are still occupying some parts of Lebanon (and the Syrian Golan Heights)Isrealis have no interest in occupying Lebanon so wrecking it or capturing it both works
ask why the objective changedObjectives change self delusions is for self just like how Pakistanis think 1971 was some sort of tactical victory
end result: occupation ended (2000), invasion failed (2006)End result:
Israel destroyed Lebanon and forever made hezboullah think twice..hence 50,000 dead and hezboullah quiet
I meant their origins as well as their trainers..
Golam heights are strategic..the issue is you are not defining 'end result' in military terms.
you are wrong. they occupied south Lebanon for 18 years from 1982 and are still occupying some parts of Lebanon (and the Syrian Golan Heights)
ask why the objective changed
end result: occupation ended (2000), invasion failed (2006)
2 IDF terrorists killed and many injured by Hezbollah in last 24 hours. 5 Hezbollah martyred in same time period. Hezbollah has fired 800+ ATGMs and 2000+ rockets into Israel since October 8th. Hezbollah is the one group that is not "quiet" in the face of Israel's genocide in Gaza (along with Yemen and Iraqi Resistance).
nonsense, they were willing to return Golan Heights to Syria just as they were willing to return Sinai to EgyptGolam heights are strategic..
Israel will only occupy areas strategic for them
they occupied Golan Heights and all of Palestine for 50+ years alreadyThey don't have any resources to occupy any land
Total Arab population is irrelevant in age of nation states ... Israel occupies land of neighbours not of Arabs 1000s of km away.Israel population is just 9.5 million
For context Arab have population of 500 million (50:1)