tsunset
The Legend
I said they (Americans) sees you as slaves, not that you are a slave.What's this gibberish ? Why are you Iranians bringing Pakistan into your sht ? "Pakistanis are slaves like Indian " what does that mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I said they (Americans) sees you as slaves, not that you are a slave.What's this gibberish ? Why are you Iranians bringing Pakistan into your sht ? "Pakistanis are slaves like Indian " what does that mean?
Something that is suicidal and everyone knows you won't dare to use it will not give you deterrence. If anything, it will only be used to convince the world that Iran is an immediate threat and needs to be handled at any cost.I am not suggesting to use it actually but present it as deterent.
If by "they" you had meant the US/Israel and by "proxy" you had meant Pakistan or Turkey or GCC then you would have been correct. People living in glass houses should not be throwing stones. Let's return to the topic.Then again they have probably attacked directly or via proxy every Muslim country in the region. You cannot dream of attacking other Muslim countries and try to represent yourself as a model country.
Something that is suicidal and everyone knows you won't dare to use it will not give you deterrence. If anything, it will only be used to convince the world that Iran is an immediate threat and needs to be handled at any cost.
TelAviv is barely 60kms from Jerusalem, its a tiny country in terms of widthNot near AlAqsa but near Tel Aviv and other Jew populated area and I am not suggesting to use it actually but present it as deterent.
Good post and points.
I am also suspecting Iran may do a surprise missile attack to take out US military aircraft sitting like ducks in airfields across the middle east ,especially the Muffawaq airbase In Jordan. this is just a hypothetical idea pls (disclaimer- i want and love peace in the world amd dont advocatefor violence)- Iranian planners may decide to initiate a strike on US aircraft parked en mass in the open air when no/few US troops are nearby, so human collateral is less when the aircrafts are struck by missiles. US taking time to get its military posture fully in place is a vulnerability that the Iranian military could exploit.
dude you know when people talk about using nuclear weapons or say even a “dirty bomb” on Israel they don’t actually think hey millions of Muslims dead with the Jewish inhabitants I agree nations of the region should go nuclear but only as a deterrent not to be actually used on anyone it’s like the Cold War MAD everyone gets Fubar if one country or the other uses it so no one uses itA dirty bomb near AlAqsa? what are you even suggesting
Those were warning shots. I'm sure nobody in the Iranian military, or Houthis, is stupid enough to think they can target US carriers with single shots.
Iran's only chance of actually damaging a USN protected asset is by overwhelming their air defenses first. Something that hasn't been tried before.
using a nuke is not a deterrent- building it is a deterrent, the moment you use its MADdude you know when people talk about using nuclear weapons or say even a “dirty bomb” on Israel they don’t actually think hey millions of Muslims dead with the Jewish inhabitants I agree nations of the region should go nuclear but only as a deterrent not to be actually used on anyone it’s like the Cold War MAD everyone gets Fubar if one country or the other uses it so no one uses it
We need to increase the range of Persian Gulf and Abu-Mahdi missiles. The USN will most likely stay out of the range of our anti-ship missiles.Strike comprised of following can get through the AD shield of ships:
- Persian Gulf or Zolfaghar-Basir (EO guided AShBM) (700 KM)
- Fattah-1 hypersonic N version (1600 KM)
- Abu-Mahdi AShCM (1000 KM)
- Shahed-238 Turbojet drones or Karrar drones (can reach 0.8 Mach)
Forgive my ignorance, but do guidance systems of these anti ship missiles depend on coastal radars or are they heat seeking or how do they work?
Yeah that’s what I said only idiots would actually use a nuclear weapon if another country actually has the same weapons and Israel has multiple methods of deliveryusing a nuke is not a deterrent- building it is a deterrent, the moment you use its MAD
Other than the Fattah 1, the CVN is deployed beyond the range of the other 3 so the assumption that you can overwhelm the C-RAM with Shaheds wont really work.Strike comprised of following can get through the AD shield of ships:
- Persian Gulf or Zolfaghar-Basir (EO guided AShBM) (700 KM)
- Fattah-1 hypersonic N version (1600 KM)
- Abu-Mahdi AShCM (1000 KM)
- Shahed-238 Turbojet drones or Karrar drones (can reach 0.8 Mach)
The range of Shahed-238 can be extended up to 2,500 km though.Other than the Fattah 1, the CVN is deployed beyond the range of the other 3 so the assumption that you can overwhelm the C-RAM with Shaheds wont really work.
If you take into account the multiple KC135s deployed to the region we can say that the CVN would probably operate out of range of the Fattah too causing losing a few tankers and jets is acceptable compared to the CVN
Each American destroyer has 90 defensive missiles and CWIS systems, and the number of defensive missiles in a fleet is very large. The Yemenis could not get past their defenses by firing 3-4 missiles, but they forced the fleet to retreat.The USN successfully countered Iranian origin anti-ship missiles during the attacks on Yemen ( with hindsight a good workout against Iranian origin systems ).
Has Iran addressed the problems of why they were so ineffective against the USN, can Iran be sure that their own systems will be more successful ?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.