Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

I am not suggesting to use it actually but present it as deterent.
Something that is suicidal and everyone knows you won't dare to use it will not give you deterrence. If anything, it will only be used to convince the world that Iran is an immediate threat and needs to be handled at any cost.
 
Then again they have probably attacked directly or via proxy every Muslim country in the region. You cannot dream of attacking other Muslim countries and try to represent yourself as a model country.
If by "they" you had meant the US/Israel and by "proxy" you had meant Pakistan or Turkey or GCC then you would have been correct. People living in glass houses should not be throwing stones. Let's return to the topic.
 
Good post and points.

I am also suspecting Iran may do a surprise missile attack to take out US military aircraft sitting like ducks in airfields across the middle east ,especially the Muffawaq airbase In Jordan. this is just a hypothetical idea pls (disclaimer- i want and love peace in the world amd dont advocatefor violence)- Iranian planners may decide to initiate a strike on US aircraft parked en mass in the open air when no/few US troops are nearby, so human collateral is less when the aircrafts are struck by missiles. US taking time to get its military posture fully in place is a vulnerability that the Iranian military could exploit.

After 12 days war, Ideally Iran should have tried and transported some short range missiles to a secret underground facility in Iraq for future conflicts (Provided if they have strong allies over there). If they had planned and had such a base then it could have caused real blow against that Jordanian airbase now. It would have been an element of surprise. Plus Iran could just put the blame on local militias, if it don't want to looked like doing those strikes.

But I think they don't have any such short range missiles base in Iraq otherwise now is a golden opportunity to use it. Since Qasem solemani they are unable to plan things aggressively. Trump killed Solemani because he was a good strategist of IRGC.
 
A dirty bomb near AlAqsa? what are you even suggesting
dude you know when people talk about using nuclear weapons or say even a “dirty bomb” on Israel they don’t actually think hey millions of Muslims dead with the Jewish inhabitants I agree nations of the region should go nuclear but only as a deterrent not to be actually used on anyone it’s like the Cold War MAD everyone gets Fubar if one country or the other uses it so no one uses it
 
Those were warning shots. I'm sure nobody in the Iranian military, or Houthis, is stupid enough to think they can target US carriers with single shots.

Iran's only chance of actually damaging a USN protected asset is by overwhelming their air defenses first. Something that hasn't been tried before.

Strike comprised of following can get through the AD shield of ships:

- Persian Gulf or Zolfaghar-Basir (EO guided AShBM) (700 KM)
- Fattah-1 hypersonic N version (1600 KM)
- Abu-Mahdi AShCM (1000 KM)
- Shahed-238 Turbojet drones or Karrar drones (can reach 0.8 Mach)
 
dude you know when people talk about using nuclear weapons or say even a “dirty bomb” on Israel they don’t actually think hey millions of Muslims dead with the Jewish inhabitants I agree nations of the region should go nuclear but only as a deterrent not to be actually used on anyone it’s like the Cold War MAD everyone gets Fubar if one country or the other uses it so no one uses it
using a nuke is not a deterrent- building it is a deterrent, the moment you use its MAD
 
Strike comprised of following can get through the AD shield of ships:

- Persian Gulf or Zolfaghar-Basir (EO guided AShBM) (700 KM)
- Fattah-1 hypersonic N version (1600 KM)
- Abu-Mahdi AShCM (1000 KM)
- Shahed-238 Turbojet drones or Karrar drones (can reach 0.8 Mach)
We need to increase the range of Persian Gulf and Abu-Mahdi missiles. The USN will most likely stay out of the range of our anti-ship missiles.
 
Forgive my ignorance, but do guidance systems of these anti ship missiles depend on coastal radars or are they heat seeking or how do they work?

Here's how typical Antiship missiles like C802s, harpoons, exocets works. The radars / sensors (on ground, ship or aircrafts) detects enemy warship location, their direction and their speed. The missile is fired at approximate location where the target would be once the missile has covered the distance. During the last phase, the missile itself is carrying active radar which can track a target emitting signals or emissions or both. These missiles are effective in ranges of upto 300 kms.

Enemy can evade these missiles with combination of various techniques:
- Change course immediately as the missile launch is detected timely (americans can detect launches immediately)
- Use long range / medium range air defense missiles to intercept.
- Use EW / Jamming to jam incoming missile radar
- and finally point defense missiles / CIWS / Chaffs / Flares.

The newer and longer range Antiship missiles (targeting at above 500 km ranges) must include mid-course correction (that is possible with real time picture of battlespace and advance sensors and space capabilities). American carrier group is moving around 1000 Km from Iranian coast.
 
using a nuke is not a deterrent- building it is a deterrent, the moment you use its MAD
Yeah that’s what I said only idiots would actually use a nuclear weapon if another country actually has the same weapons and Israel has multiple methods of delivery
 
Strike comprised of following can get through the AD shield of ships:

- Persian Gulf or Zolfaghar-Basir (EO guided AShBM) (700 KM)
- Fattah-1 hypersonic N version (1600 KM)
- Abu-Mahdi AShCM (1000 KM)
- Shahed-238 Turbojet drones or Karrar drones (can reach 0.8 Mach)
Other than the Fattah 1, the CVN is deployed beyond the range of the other 3 so the assumption that you can overwhelm the C-RAM with Shaheds wont really work.
If you take into account the multiple KC135s deployed to the region we can say that the CVN would probably operate out of range of the Fattah too causing losing a few tankers and jets is acceptable compared to the CVN
 
Other than the Fattah 1, the CVN is deployed beyond the range of the other 3 so the assumption that you can overwhelm the C-RAM with Shaheds wont really work.
If you take into account the multiple KC135s deployed to the region we can say that the CVN would probably operate out of range of the Fattah too causing losing a few tankers and jets is acceptable compared to the CVN
The range of Shahed-238 can be extended up to 2,500 km though.
But Iran probably doesn't have enough Shahed-136 or Shahed-238 drones. At least, that's what it seemed like during the 12-day war.
 
The USN successfully countered Iranian origin anti-ship missiles during the attacks on Yemen ( with hindsight a good workout against Iranian origin systems ).

Has Iran addressed the problems of why they were so ineffective against the USN, can Iran be sure that their own systems will be more successful ?
Each American destroyer has 90 defensive missiles and CWIS systems, and the number of defensive missiles in a fleet is very large. The Yemenis could not get past their defenses by firing 3-4 missiles, but they forced the fleet to retreat.

If Iran wanted to fire, it would fire hundreds of missiles/drones at the same time.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top