I know you by now, and I know that "truth" is a pretty flexible concept for you; after all, the moment you can twist someone's argument or even just deliberately misinterpret it, you’re right back in your element.
So, let me spell this out for you—and to be quoted, too:
- NO, Kaan certainly isn't a "paper project"—I never claimed that... but it isn't a combat-proven system yet, either; it doesn't have a radar installed whose development is complete and whose performance parameters have been verified.
- None of the RCS figures are confirmed, none of its other performances and let's be clear: Kaan is a prototype with only TWO —that's "2," for the idiots out there— flights under its belt as a demonstrator... the actual prototype hasn't even flown yet, yet you're already exaggerating as if it were confirmed to be operationally superior to XYZ.
I know we’ll have this discussion many times over the coming years, and every time, you’ll ignore arguments, spread PR propaganda, and bash anyone who criticizes it. But as long as the engine isn't finished (and it’s nowhere near ready) and the avionics package isn't considered production-ready, the whole thing is anything but finished!
And even you can't deny that!
