VCheng
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Not when they're fake sheikhdoms and slaves of the west.
So what happens if the other side makes the same argument against Iran as being a fake theocracy and hence illegitimate? See, others can play the same game too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not when they're fake sheikhdoms and slaves of the west.
Christian Zionists are concerned about gog and Magog prophecies, but those prophecies are not related to Iran, it's about Russia invading Israel.Military, economic or technological threats are not the only threats Iran is the enemy of Israel and Israel controlled US. There is an important factor people remove from the equation which plays a crucial role in the heads of US and Israeli leaders namely, ideology. The Zionist entity and Christo-Zionists in US believe in the destruction of Iran to establish the greater Israel and return of Messiah. They are trying to fulfill a prophecy by dividing and destroying Iran. Friend or Foe, they will go for it.
- Destruction of military strength: “I will break the bow of Elam, the foremost of their might” (Jeremiah 49:35), symbolizing the collapse of Elam’s military power
- Scattering of the people: The prophecy states that Elam’s exiles will be dispersed to all nations, indicating a comprehensive exile (Jeremiah 49:36)
- Overthrow of leadership: God declares He will destroy the king and princes and set His throne in Elam, emphasizing divine authority over human rulers (Jeremiah 49:37–38)
They believe the current Iran is a continuation of the old Elam and they want to destroy it.
They have.So the other coastal states to the same body of water have no rights?
Many would vehemently disagree. Making such a claim will simply not work, no matter how often repeated.
| Direction | Traffic Percentage | Destination |
| 8 Inbound | ████████░░ (44%) | Cangjie, Starway, Ascanios, etc. |
| 10 Outbound | ██████████ (56%) | Cangjie, Starway, Ascanios, etc |


The ruling class of a country derives legitimacy from being put there by another power, versus grabbing power and withstanding the heaviest of possible outside pressures for 50 years running. There is your answer.So what happens if the other side makes the same argument against Iran as being a fake theocracy and hence illegitimate? See, others can play the same game too.
But they decided to create with US a South corridor that is just the countrary, a way to deny iranians rights.
The ruling class of a country derives legitimacy from being put there by another power, versus grabbing power and withstanding the heaviest of possible outside pressures for 50 years running. There is your answer.
Right of self defence, managing and controlling the strait up to Emirati and Omani coast. Iran never ratified UNCLOS. Iran got attacked with backing of PGCC and because of that Iran has the right to expand its control in Persian Gulf, for its security. If I had a say I would conquer Qatari and Kuwaiti energyfields in addition.What "rights" does Iran have within Omani coastal waters?
I am not talking about the strait or the persian gulf. I'm talking about the legitimacy of a government. Look at Pakista, a ruling military dictatorship that just, at the press of a button by the US, nullified the wish of the people by imprisoning Khan. That's not a legitimate government. Or whatever the PCGG countries do that is against their own interest. Who tells the Iranian government what to do?Not much of an answer there, Sir.
A power grab is a power grab. Legitimacy only derives from support of the people. In this regard, your argument applies equally to just about all the states in the region.
Iran has the right to expand its control in Persian Gulf, for its security.
Who tells the Iranian government what to do?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.