Chinese SAC - FC-31/J-35 5th Gen Stealth Aircraft

[Oscar]

The J-35 Chinese nickname is “蓝鲨 Blue Shark”.------This is an unofficial announcement.
View attachment 80156

========================================
Special Tips.
The PLA has a certain pattern when it comes to naming the Chinese nicknames of equipment. Air Force fighters use the “龙 Dragon” series and Navy fighters use the “鲨 Shark” series.
However, the J-35 series is a fighter that takes into account both the Air Force and the Navy. Therefore, we can only assume that “蓝鲨 Blue Shark” is the Chinese nickname for the naval version of the J-35. The Chinese nickname for the Air Force version of the J-35A is currently unknown.

I hope they call it Hidden Dragon

Then they can call a UCAV “crouching tiger”


So when they fight together its 臥虎藏龍
“Crouching tiger, hidden dragon”

 

[SolarWarden]

"Dominant lead in terms of onboard avionics"



What a total clown as he has no basis to make this claim.

He actually does have the "basis" to make such claims his background speaks for himself unlike yours which is.... trust me bruh? You are the guy that says F-35 is not a 5th gen fighter even though USAF and LM says the F-35 is a 5th gen fighter. The hubris of some bengali that lives off/takes pride of another country's high-tech progress as his own says a lot about that person.

 

[UKBengali]

He actually does have the "basis" to make such claims his background speaks for himself unlike yours which is.... trust me bruh? You are the guy that says F-35 is not a 5th gen fighter even though USAF and LM says the F-35 is a 5th gen fighter. The hubris of some bengali that lives off/takes pride of another country's high-tech progress as his own says a lot about that person.

Has he seen the radar and avionics inside J-35 to make his claim?

 

[Deino]

Close up

 

[iblini]

Close up

View attachment 81189

The build quality!

 

[MrManiac]

 

[SolarWarden]

Has he seen the radar and avionics inside J-35 to make his claim?

Have you? You seem to pull claims out of your a** all the time when it comes to the F-35, J-20 and now J-35 the only difference between you and Alex Hollings is he's more qualified than a bengali kid living at home giving us his "truth" what the F-35 is, therefore ignore the claims from the company who made it and USAF who flies it.

Are you really that out of touch that you don't even hear yourself and your ridiculous claims? The nerve to say "has he seen the radar an avionics to make his claims" when you likely have never seen any kind of jet fighter up close yet somehow that doesn't stop you from your claims... talk about hubris.

 

[SiliconBit (silicon0000)]

Close up

View attachment 81189

It looks like the RAM coating was applied after the nose cone was attached.

Regarding the J-35's RAM coating, Is it surface-applied coating similar to the F-22's or the baked-in coating like the F-35. My guess is it's seems like F22's type of RAM Coating which means it requires more frequent maintenance and has higher maintenance cost too.

But that's my guess, anyone has any info about this?

 

[lightning f57]

Im expecting some kind of RCS analysis to land soon on the J35, it would be good to see even what biased or western analysts think based on the videos and pictures seen to date.

 

[UKBengali]

Im expecting some kind of RCS analysis to land soon on the J35, it would be good to see even what biased or western analysts think based on the videos and pictures seen to date.

With the J-20, there have been some good independent western analysts that put its rcs at better than Su-57 but lower than F-22. This seems reasonable.

The J-35 is likely to be more stealthier than J-20 due to lack of canards and the airframe itself looks extremely "clean".

 

[Michael]

With the J-20, there have been some good independent western analysts that put its rcs at better than Su-57 but lower than F-22. This seems reasonable.

The F-35 is likely to be more stealthier than J-20 due to lack of canards and the airframe itself looks extremely "clean".

Because the Chinese and American militaries have been in the Western Pacific region for many years in the “friendly sparring”, both militaries actually know most of the real situation of the J-20, F-22, F-35. However, the Chinese and American armies will not release the real information. Therefore, any analyst's speculation is meaningless.

 

[lightning f57]

Because the Chinese and American militaries have been in the Western Pacific region for many years in the “friendly sparring”, both militaries actually know most of the real situation of the J-20, F-22, F-35. However, the Chinese and American armies will not release the real information. Therefore, any analyst's speculation is meaningless.

The speculation helps us military enthusiasts pass the time in x vs y debates

 

[Deino]

It looks like the RAM coating was applied after the nose cone was attached.

Regarding the J-35's RAM coating, Is it surface-applied coating similar to the F-22's or the baked-in coating like the F-35. My guess is it's seems like F22's type of RAM Coating which means it requires more frequent maintenance and has higher maintenance cost too.

But that's my guess, anyone has any info about this?

My guess it is just a prototype with no RAM but just paint applied

 

[UKBengali]

Have you? You seem to pull claims out of your a** all the time when it comes to the F-35, J-20 and now J-35 the only difference between you and Alex Hollings is he's more qualified than a bengali kid living at home giving us his "truth" what the F-35 is, therefore ignore the claims from the company who made it and USAF who flies it.

Are you really that out of touch that you don't even hear yourself and your ridiculous claims? The nerve to say "has he seen the radar an avionics to make his claims" when you likely have never seen any kind of jet fighter up close yet somehow that doesn't stop you from your claims... talk about hubris.

What would those "claims" be buddy?

I am just expressing my opinion, unlike that muppet in the video who categorically stated that the F-35 had superior radar and avionics to J-35. Did he inspect both planes? Of course not and so is talking nonsense.

Unlike you I am well educated and knowledgable in STEM(physics and computing) and so have a very good ability to digest information in the areas of aerodynamics, radars and EW.

Anyone with an ounce of knowledge knows that F-35 would have to fight defensively against the supercruising and more maneuverable J-35A. J-35A would be able to get into firing position first( with higher top speed and altitude) and F-35 would have to defend itself and then fight back if it survives.

Most experts think supercruise is a must have feature set of 5th generation fighters and both F-22 and J-20(even with WS-10C engine) supercruise. J-35 will as well. F-35 does not and so I(like many others) do not consider it 5th generation since it lacks ability to supercruise.

Now you have improved somewhat recently on this forum, don't slide back to your old ways if you want to last and more importantly get some real value out of this forum.

 

[That_Guy]

My guess it is just a prototype with no RAM but just paint applied

I'd assume so as well. Seems to make no sense applying RAM to it at this stage of development. From what I can tell, weapons haven't even been tested yet on it, so it's still far from completing development.