Oscar
Moderator
- Mar 28, 2009
- 43,528
- 97,359
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
Pakistan is 20 measured nuclear explosions within its core urban Urban areas to put it out of viable existence as a country ..As you said, it's difficult to know, even people are not sure if india was having less nuclear bombs previously compared to Pakistan, everything was based on this site only that caught by other sources.As per understanding, india had capability to make more than 200 nuclear bombs previously.
No one can confirm that how many actual bombs made by india expect government officials... India mostly focus on plutonium based bombs since we have sufficient material for the bombs - more than 1000.
so the OP self fellatio is limited to ruining his seat cover by giving himself self assuring statements of “tactical” vs “Strategic” warheads as if he was personally inspecting the yields on Pakistani stockpiles.
India has problems north as well.
However, I don’t think anyone has been ever more adamant in terms of quid pro quo plus than Gen Kidwai and what he alluded to wasn’t clear to those interested - it extendeds to number of warheads aimed as well.
For that matter, quid pro quo plus is ensuring that whatever proportional damage is caused to Pakistan can be (regardless of Pakistan not existing in the hours of a nuclear exchange) is guaranteed…not launched, not deployed but guaranteed equivalent RELATIVE damage
So if India has the equivalent of percentage damage to lets say Multan or Lahore being lost and then that relative percentage of Indian population will be given gamma dosage as well.
Hate the establishment for ruining a country’s true growth and potential but they along with some other thinkers in intelligencia(scientists,seasoned diplomats and engineers) put that into stone and lo and behold it is.