Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Liquidator said:
It's a legitimate and easy target for Iran.

Fortune favours the bold...

Air defence will be via naval assets.
Click to expand...
what naval assets are permanently (or currently) deployed at Diego Garcia?

certainly not an "easy" target to strike 4000km away with precision
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


good thread about ineffectiveness of US attack on underground missile base in Sana'a in October 2024 using B-2 bombers

the US attacked the entrance and access roads, but satellite imagery shows that Ansarallah quickly built new entrances, and the base otherwise did not seem significantly damaged

www.theguardian.com

US attacks Houthi targets in Yemen with B-2 stealth bombers for first time

Escalation was to ‘defend US forces and personnel’, says Lloyd Austin, as Houthi official says US ‘will pay the price’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
Persian Gulf said:
what naval assets are permanently (or currently) deployed at Diego Garcia?

certainly not an "easy" target to strike 4000km away with precision
Click to expand...

The Shaheen 3 if Pakistan has a range of 3750km, which covers all of India

That range is probably the "official" range of the missile and it most likely can go a little further

Pakistan has been attempting to obtain various equipment including testing equipment in order to make our rocket motors/engines more efficient thus pushing the range further

As soon as our missile arsenal became more varied and we attempted to increase the range, the U.S has jumped into action and has levied multiple sanctions against Pakistan to try and limit our missile ranges

They THINK AHEAD, so in their machinations if ever in future their is war and Pakistan is involved they don't want our missiles to be able to reach Diego Garcia
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


@Immortals
Click to expand...

So far i've never seen him being correct on any of his pseudo "predictions" with the only source being his bipolar disorder

Babak also predicted that the sites would be bombed back in 2018

This clown even dares to tell people precisely which squadron will participate in the "secret operation"
 
hussain0216 said:
The Shaheen 3 if Pakistan has a range of 3750km, which covers all of India

That range is probably the "official" range of the missile and it most likely can go a little further

Pakistan has been attempting to obtain various equipment including testing equipment in order to make our rocket motors/engines more efficient thus pushing the range further

As soon as our missile arsenal became more varied and we attempted to increase the range, the U.S has jumped into action and has levied multiple sanctions against Pakistan to try and limit our missile ranges

They THINK AHEAD, so in their machinations if ever in future their is war and Pakistan is involved they don't want our missiles to be able to reach Diego Garcia
Click to expand...
That is a nuclear missile so accuracy is likely terrible and not important. for this strike accuracy of < 20m CEP is needed which is almost impossible for a 4000km range missile
 
tsunset said:
So far i've never seen him being correct on any of his pseudo "predictions" with the only source being his bipolar disorder

Babak also predicted that the sites would be bombed back in 2018

This clown even dares to tell people precisely which squadron will participate in the "secret operation"
Click to expand...
yes I certainly wouldn't believe everything he says

but he has good insights into Iranian air force, most of that stuff tends to be true
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


good thread about ineffectiveness of US attack on underground missile base in Sana'a in October 2024 using B-2 bombers

the US attacked the entrance and access roads, but satellite imagery shows that Ansarallah quickly built new entrances, and the base otherwise did not seem significantly damaged

www.theguardian.com

US attacks Houthi targets in Yemen with B-2 stealth bombers for first time

Escalation was to ‘defend US forces and personnel’, says Lloyd Austin, as Houthi official says US ‘will pay the price’
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...


This actually sounds like bad news.
Many people have claimed that underground tunnels are so sturdy that even bunker-busting bombs would only create small holes without causing a collapse. They've also argued that any debris could be easily cleared for a quick recovery.
However, in reality, when hit by US bombings, tunnels have suffered massive collapses, leaving no choice but to dig from the outside to access other entrances.
As proven by Israel's missile attacks on Iran, the guided bombs and missiles used by the West are far more powerful than previously, optimistically assumed.
In a real crisis, with daily heavy bombings, there would be no time for recovery. The vast equipment and personnel in underground bases risk being buried alive as all passages collapse, leading to complete annihilation.
 
Garcia Sea said:
This actually sounds like bad news.
Many people have claimed that underground tunnels are so sturdy that even bunker-busting bombs would only create small holes without causing a collapse. They've also argued that any debris could be easily cleared for a quick recovery.
However, in reality, when hit by US bombings, tunnels have suffered massive collapses, leaving no choice but to dig from the outside to access other entrances.
As proven by Israel's missile attacks on Iran, the guided bombs and missiles used by the West are far more powerful than previously, optimistically assumed.
In a real crisis, with daily heavy bombings, there would be no time for recovery. The vast equipment and personnel in underground bases risk being buried alive as all passages collapse, leading to complete annihilation.
Click to expand...
That's why the response has to be Nuclear, Plasma, EMP or any other Strategic WMD that knocks out the enemy's warfighting ability. If a massive US bombing happens, Iran needs to retaliate big time.
 
StrategicBear said:
That's why the response has to be Nuclear, Plasma, EMP or any other Strategic WMD that knocks out the enemy's warfighting ability. If a massive US bombing happens, Iran needs to retaliate big time.
Click to expand...
Trumpy if he attacks will be on the basis that Irans retaliation will be weak and does minimal damage. This is because Iran allowed the escalation ladder to get out of control and does not have a deterring point any longer. So Iran if its attacked needs to strike back with massive force otherwise it will be open to continuous strikes.

Massive force could lead to war. But ask yourself do you want to be ground out with constant attacks on your country with impunity or attack ferociously so the enemy pauses to think and back off from all out war.

Trumpy with his throwing allies under the bus wont have allot of international support with igniting a regional war his own maga followers may turn on him too. So he will know a war is not a good outcome no matter how big he might talk right now.

Irans trump cards are its missile forces and nuclear program, trumpy is coming for both so I would hope Iran has a credible plan to deal with this facist.
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


@Immortals
Click to expand...

Lol. Who the hell is this guy and where did he get this info? Signal chat?

Look youz guys Orange man is NOT going to attack Iran as in a first strike the B2's have history of being deployed in Diego Garcia all the time... Orange man may also be using this at the same time as a negotiation tactic that's all... trust me bruh. 👼

Iran should be concern with Israel I think they have set a date and told the US and it is possible we're there for a "just in case break glass" built up.
 
Garcia Sea said:
This actually sounds like bad news.
Many people have claimed that underground tunnels are so sturdy that even bunker-busting bombs would only create small holes without causing a collapse. They've also argued that any debris could be easily cleared for a quick recovery.
However, in reality, when hit by US bombings, tunnels have suffered massive collapses, leaving no choice but to dig from the outside to access other entrances.
As proven by Israel's missile attacks on Iran, the guided bombs and missiles used by the West are far more powerful than previously, optimistically assumed.
In a real crisis, with daily heavy bombings, there would be no time for recovery. The vast equipment and personnel in underground bases risk being buried alive as all passages collapse, leading to complete annihilation.
Click to expand...
there is no evidence tunnels collapsed, only the entrance was destroyed, but they rebuilt it from the inside
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 66 (members: 9, guests: 57)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top