Your point about the alternative method to hand over temple property (a wrong categorisation) to private trusts and priests and pandas is very sharp. However, there are false equivalences being proposed to you.
Please look up who is entitled to govern religious property, and the status of property supposed to belong to temples. It does not belong to the temple; the temple has no existence in the law governing these properties. The temple does not earn. There is zero equivalence with Church and Mosque earnings (not property) from donations, local or foreign, and it is a canard spread by bhakts like two idiots who are clouding the whole argument. Ignore this bait.