Lol, US is trying very hard to intervene in nearly every corner of the world. Even according to your list, US pretty much intervenes in the whole world. In South Asia, it's true that US maybe more interested about India than BD, but didn't you hear that US wants a military base from BD and CIA is involved in the recent overthrow of BD gov, it just shows how deep US is involved in BD affairs, you are the one that is blind. Yeah, US is all for good for you Indians, lol.That is rather idiotic . Even in its heyday, the US had only limited influence. Today the world is multipolar and the US has very limited bandwidth and resources. The major strategic objectives of the US are :
1) Maintaining US hegemony in the Americas so that there is no threat to the mainland .
2) Maintaining treaty ( mainly NATO) security commitments
3) Protecting trade and energy supply routes for the US and close allies.
The regions where the US seeks influence are, in order of importance
1) Its own backyard
2) Western Europe ( due to NATO commitments )
3) Middle East ( because of oil, Israel and Iran's nuclear ambitions )
4) Asia Pacific ( mainly to protect its allies Japan, Australia and South Korea and North Korea's nuclear threat and to prevent China from becoming stronger than itself )
5) Afpak and India to some extent because of the history of 9/11 and India and Pakistan being nuclear states .
Every thing else is a sideshow . Bangladesh is not even a sideshow to a sideshow .
quotes:
"We may expand so as to include the whole world. Mexico, Central America, South America, Cuba, the West India Islands, and even England and France [we] might annex without inconvenience... allowing them with their local Legislatures to regulate their local affairs in their own way. And this, Sir, is the mission of this Republic and its ultimate destiny."
Manifest destiny - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org