NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
- Oct 29, 2020
- 10,545
- 4,149
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
NoneWhat will be Pakistan's contribution in the project ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoneWhat will be Pakistan's contribution in the project ?
Only in drawing boardWhy would India join anything when AMCA already exists
We are not inducting a 5th gen today, are we?Only in drawing board
Yeah your AMCA will be inducted in or after 2035We are not inducting a 5th gen today, are we?
Yeah, so?Yeah your AMCA will be inducted in or after 2035
We will have j31 much earlier than your AMCAYeah, so?
CongratulationsWe will have j31 much earlier than your AMCA
No need to be cocky and no need to count your chickens before they've hatched.We will have j31 much earlier than your AMCA
The sooner you send the more of the Indian trolls to your ignore list the easier your life will be in this forum.....You don't seem like a serious aviation enthusiast. Saying the KAAN and the J-31 are the same is about as accurate as saying the F-15 and the F-18 are "absolutely same". Its two different class of fighters. A simple side by side would show you they are completely different dimensions. Not to mention the J-31 as of right now is a naval aircraft, we haven't seen the Air Force version b/c China isn't planning on inducting it, and instead building J-20s in mass.
I don't think the early Block 15s will have enough airframe life left in them to be worth upgrading to either V standard (assuming the US even allows it) or the Turkish Ozgur version, maybe the 18 or so Block 52 Vipers, but in any case, it would require US approval for both V and Ozgur upgrades. The J-10CE is essentially a hedge in lieu of upgrading the Vipers.
I think the J-35 will become a multirole platform, and the KAAN the 'high' end air superiority platform. An outlier remains the domestic 'Azm' programme, but in my view this will be scaled down from a heavyweight twin engine platform to a single engine platform with the option of an unmanned version to act as a loyal wingman, if the announcements of collaborating with Turkey are anything to go by. A cheaper single engine NGF type may end up being the backbone to replace the JF-17 in large numbers.
None of the treaty allies minus UK and France have nukes. India has nukes and yet has all the privileges of non-nuclear treaty allies
Pakistan always had a two tier AF since the 70s. Upper/lower tier mixes like Mirages/Sabres; F-16/F-6 & others etc.tbh, I think the J-31/35 and KAAN could solve different problems.
The KAAN is larger than the J-31/35 (e.g., uses two GE F110s) and, based on how TAI's configuring it, shaping up with more of a strike-centric role (e.g., EOTS). This makes sense because since the TuAF lost access to the F-35, they've needed their NGFA to be more suitable for strike. It might be why the TuAF went for a larger design with the KAAN (30-35 tons) needing two GE F110s rather than a single-engine F110 design or twin F404 platform (21-27 tons).
So, to the PAF, the KAAN could make for a really good strike platform (directly replacing the Mirage III/5s in the role). OTOH, I view the J-31/35 as more of a general workhorse fighter.
SAC is designing the J-35 with the PLAN's needs in mind, so I imagine it'd need a good balance of air-to-air and air-to-surface capabilities. It should also be scalable, so SAC will work to control production and long-term maintenance/operating costs.
Finally, China has a strategic interest in the J-35 (for the PLAN's needs), so there's a guaranteed, hefty order book to initiate scale (and lower unit costs). I also think other countries have quietly committed to the J-31/35, like Egypt, Algeria, KSA, or others. Besides waiting for the KAAN, there is no other NGFA option for anyone outside of the West. So, the launching order book of the J-31/35 will likely be the best of any Chinese aircraft in history given that the jet is the only solution for an urgent and wide-scale problem (lack of NGFAs). In other words, the unit price promised by AVIC is likely pretty good and the PAF didn't want to miss out.
So, the question to ask is, why would the PAF need a medium-weight, multirole NGFA? Well, its older F-16A/Bs (i.e., the current medium-weight, multirole fighter) are aging and will reach their OEM-defined lifespans by 2040. The J-31/35 would likely replace the Peace Gate I/II Falcons.
That said, from 2040, I can see the PAF giving the KAAN a serious look, but as a specialized asset for the strike role. The KAAN is bigger and, potentially, a future block (ideally the one with the TR Motor engines) will have a bigger internal payload, better sensors for surface tracking/targeting (e.g., an improved EOTS, a high-powered AESA radar with really good SAR/GMTI, etc).
The PAF had wanted a genuine strike platform for decades - from A-7 Corsair II in the 1970s to the M2K-5 in the 1990s. It's been elusive for one reason or another, but the KAAN is shaping up to being that type of platform.
For me, the bigger question is what happens to the PAF's tactical fighter element as it evolves into a next-gen air force. Be it KAAN or J-31/35, the stealth NGFAs are strategically valuable as conventional deterrents (excellent air-to-surface and air-to-air), but they're high cost, not just from a procurement standpoint, but operational too. You're not flying any of those as frequently and aggressively as the JF-17 or even the F-16.
The PAF can't afford to treat air power as a luxury, so it needs a "beater" like the JF-17 to drive the bulk of tactical operations. Now, I wonder if this "next gen air force" has a place for a fighter like the JF-17 in the future. Would the PAF develop another lightweight tactical fighter like the JF-17 (e.g., single engine, but relaxed stability, built around AESA radar, composites, etc)? Or, is this why the PAF ordered the J-10CE? @Oscar @arslank01 @Qureshi @Deino
I'd also say that block 70/72s are cost prohibitive even if taking the upgrade route (which makes little sense for Block 15s). Better to buy J-10s for the same of less and similar or better capabilities.Bro, the only way you're (PAF) is getting its hands on Block 70/72s' is by...
a. Accepting !srael.
b. Making Peace with !ndia.
c. Cutting of relations with China (indirectly).
d. Attacking Iran - on demand.
e. Giving space for Drones within Pak*
*something that might already be in the pipeline.
Oh & whatever Vipers you do get, will come with infamous..., or notorious: End-User Agreement
Trust me, you can attempt to break their arm in all the twisting, but the US won't even let you buy the (used) F-16's parked in Nevada.
SAAB Gripen: Same old story with US Engines.
Dassualt Rafales: Camp India
EuroFighter Typhoon: Some drama or the other.
At the moment, PAF's best & safer bet is China, be it J-10C, PL-15 & whatever swings our way in the not-so-distant-future.
I guess Pakistan is a decade ahead then the rest of the world when it comes to economic meltdownPAF is fielding J31/J35 variant by 2027. accelerated acquisition due to rapidly changing global situation... There will be perpetual war in next decade... and global economic meltdown will happen by 2035 - 2040...