Russia - Ukraine war part ll. News and Discussions

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Zelensky at Kupyansk

You would never see Putin anywhere near the front line
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Ukraine continues to strike Russian oil refineries
 

RU POV: Russian TV anchorman Vladimir Solovyev raises Russian flag in Pokrovsk - Vladimir Solovyev​


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Turkeys ship hit by mistake 😮

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Zelensky at Kupyansk

You would never see Putin anywhere near the front line

Zelensky can roam freely even through the terrain where the Russians are, so why would they kill their unconscious asset?

The same goes for Syrsky.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


The Ukrainians have cleared northern Kupyansk

It seems like a great feat, considering that Ukraine launched several simultaneous attacks around Kupyansk and simply overwhelmed the city through sheer numbers. The Russians don't have many troops in western Kupyansk due to the difficulty of reaching and supplying the city, so they can't cover all sides, leading to many gaps.

It wouldn't be considered absurd for Ukraine to retake western Kupyansk through these attacks, but the problem is that this isn't enough.

Russia wants to crush the Kupyansk pocket, which means cutting off supplies to internal units, all of which involves several floating bridges within Kupyansk.

Russia took most of western Kupyansk a few months ago and managed the last one, but they also took most of eastern Kupyansk as well. So, even if Ukraine manages to recapture all of western Kupyansk, their supplies to the pocket will still be cut off, and Russia can still pressure the remaining floating bridges.

Ukraine had great difficulty counterattacking the western half of Kupyansk, despite having a wide range of angles to approach from and no supply restrictions, so you can imagine the impossibility of retaking eastern Kupyansk, which would require channeling troops over floating bridges into a pocket or an incredibly risky river crossing within the city.

Retaking western Kupyansk also doesn't impede Russian operations in Kharkiv, as they already have a solid base on the western side of the Oskil River to the north and across the international border, so once the pocket is gone, Russia can simply rotate its units and ignore western Kupyansk until later.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Better risk assessment before the conflict could have averted many losses from the Russian side especially armor losses. Both sides show each other as in the worse situation I dont believe them both although it boosts morale on each side.
The decision to invade was the biggest mistake of this war. Today it is more than certain that Russia desired a quick campaign and expected minimal resistance, considering how they invaded and the late response of partial mobilization in October, but the Ukrainian side also made numerous mistakes, for example, if they had mobilized months before the invasion and had built a series of fortifications in the south, this would have prevented the largest Russian advance in the war, resulting in avoiding the second biggest mistake of this war: the failed Ukrainian counter-offensive of 2023.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Anothet Russian assault destroyed
 
Depends. If AWAC is used to guide air to air missiles for Ukraine's F-16 then Russia will for sure shoot down AWAC.

Even a data-link without guiding air to air missiles would give huge advantage to Ukr F16s considering Russia cannot use awacs in the same sector and we are not seeing any Russian awacs activity for a long time. As the conflict drags on there will be more risks like these.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Even a data-link without guiding air to air missiles would give huge advantage to Ukr F16s considering Russia cannot use awacs in the same sector and we are not seeing any Russian awacs activity for a long time. As the conflict drags on there will be more risks like these.

F-16 would not be a match for Su-35 or Su-57 armed with R-77M, with or without AWAC.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

RU POV: Russia's Vladimir Soloviev reports from Pokrovsk​


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top