Lo sir lo, jaldi na karo.
Not me, but two brother judges of the same bench (i.e., Justice Aminuddin Khan and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan) have already pointed out those articles and sections.
Their dissenting note said for creating and carving out relief for the PTI, the SC would have to travel beyond the jurisdiction conferred by Articles 175 and 185 of the Constitution and would also have to suspend Articles 51, 106 and 63 of the Constitution and Section 104 of the Elections Act, 2017 along with the relevant rules.
"We would also have to insert instead of Articles 51, 106 and Section 104. Such articles and sections therein in substitution and in consonance with the relief granted through the majority judgment.
"Previously there was a term used which was 'reading in to the Constitution' or 'reading down the Constitution' but now a new phrase has been introduced that of "inserting new Articles in consonance with the relief to be granted in the peculiar circumstances of the case" in the Constitution."
That is, the unasked-for relief was given to PTI under Article 187, clause 1 at the cost of all those articles and sections.
As I said before, the matter of fact is that Article 187 of the Constitution of Pakistan cannot be used by a court to subvert other constitutional articles in the name of providing complete justice (what these dishonest and politicized judges call 'other technicalities').