Iran launches Operation True Promise - massive missile/drone strikes across Israel, Israel allegedly responds with quadcopters

Status
Not open for further replies.
Apparently Israel struck Natanz nuclear facility OR an area nearby. If true it's a consequential and significant escalation, that Iran has little choice but to respond to.
Yeah right now just theories of what was struck natanz honestly at this point would be idiotic because most things underground and that kind of strike would would have Israel targeting all of Israel’s nuclear facilities and honestly I really don’t want that because they attack site with nuclear weapons storage or dimona odds are Palestinians would have their lands contaminated by any fall out
 
If Israel hit Natanz where Iran's nuclear facility is, it doesn't matter whether the facility was directly struck. It's a clear signal we can hit you anytime and anywhere. Big escalation. Iran has to forcefully respond here. Not that bs they did the first time.
 
Pakistan wants to find a way to live with its neighbors but not under their hegemony. This is also why Pakistan tested 6 devices in 1998 to counter India’s 5 plus the smiling Buddha test decades earlier.

Iran and Israel really want to go at it, toppling the other’s government; and existential political war to subjugate the other.

Btw, any indication F-35s were used?
Btw, this is why we hear a lot more from the son of the late shah. This is about regime change.

Btw the second channel β€œAmerican Optimist”; a Peter Thiel passion project, run by Joe Lonsdale. For those that know Thiel know.


 
Good.


Let us focus on the damages. Iran sanctioned or not -- is irrelevant. The moment Iran chose war, sanctions are irrelevant. If Iran chose war, they must believe the sanctions have no effects on them. In the same vein, we can go along with that.


Yes. It took a peer to defeat MT. Am not saying that Tyson and Douglas must be matched physically point for point. Just as am not saying Iran and Israel must be matched weapon for weapon. To stay with the boxing analogy. Can Roberto Duran in his prime defeat Mike Tyson in his prime? Most would say 'No'. The physical differences are too great in Tyson's favor, even though, in terms of the techniques of boxing, both fighters are the same.

So in terms of technology, Israel is geographically small, but technologically large, while Iran is geographically large, they are technologically small. Scaring civilians into shelters does not mean strategic success.

Great post, despite our disagreements which is natural, but what is better not attacking civilian infrastructure and rather β€œscaring them into shelters” or bombing civilian infrastructure for 6 months straight? Don’t want to divert this conversation there so you don’t have to respond if you don’t want to.
 
Care to explain how that's trolling? This assessment is based on the following post and partly my own opinion. Please don't get emotional.
?
 
Yeah right now just theories of what was struck natanz honestly at this point would be idiotic because most things underground and that kind of strike would would have Israel targeting all of Israel’s nuclear facilities and honestly I really don’t want that because they attack site with nuclear weapons storage or dimona odds are Palestinians would have their lands contaminated by any fall out

No Natanz attack
No nuclear attacks
Yet
 
Indeed! If a wooden bridge is being used to bring troops to fortify an area, will you use a $10 million missile to destroy it? Even if it costs just $100,000 to build? Hell Yeah!
Absolutely.

What is the value of a private? Of a hardened senior NCO? Of an academy trained captain? Different, of course. But they all crossed the same bridge on the way to the front. If we can somehow sum it all up, that bridge's value is inestimable for what it did. $10 mil is paltry.
 
Yeah right now just theories of what was struck natanz honestly at this point would be idiotic because most things underground and that kind of strike would would have Israel targeting all of Israel’s nuclear facilities and honestly I really don’t want that because they attack site with nuclear weapons storage or dimona odds are Palestinians would have their lands contaminated by any fall out
Their plan has always been to use penetrators/bunker buster bombs on Iran's nuclear facilities. Why do you think they procured thousands from the US years ago? To use against Hamas!?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top