The 80-90 unit figure is from PAF acquisition history. Whenever it purchased an aircraft from national funds, it always planned for at least 90 units.
It's not even restricted to low-cost platforms like the F-6 or F-7; for example:
Each new fighter acquisition involves a fixed overhead in training, maintenance setup, and other logistics/ground support elements. The PAF wants to distribute that load across many units rather than setting up another parallel setup after a few small purchases. Not only that, but it wants the high-tech capability to be available across Pakistan, not concentrated in one command/theater of operations. You need numbers for that.
- It acquired 90+ Mirage III/5s through the 1970s
- Planned for 110 F-16A/Bs in the late 1980s
- Negotiated for the M2K/-5 with the idea that it would eventually acquire 80
- Peace Drive F-16 plan involved 55 plus an option for 20 more (source)
Hence, when it evaluates a fighter, it doesn't think about the cost of acquiring only 20 or 30. AHQ factors in the total feasibility of building a fleet of ~90+ strong. If the PAF's focus was to acquire several dozen planes, it would've acquired the Typhoon or Su-35.
So, ultimately, the J-10CE program will stretch to at least 90 units. There are plenty of factors supporting that eventuality. First, it's available. The J-31 is still a prototype, we don't even have a LRIP unit to work with. Second, it's the workhorse of the PLAAF and in production, which gives it economies of scale and a relatively competitive price point. Third, the PAF has experience with it and knows what to expect, so why quickly reset the cycle again with the J-31?
IMO, I don't think the J-31 itself is an 'immortality play' by the current ACM, not in the way some think. I do believe the announcement was an immortality play as it was premature (the J-31 isn't in production yet) and for a domestic audience. But the J-31 isn't.
But I think AHQ has been eyeing the J-31 for years as the F-16A/Bs will start aging out in 2030. The core design of the J-31 could make for a balanced offensive 'speartip' fighter, replacing the air-to-air and SOW value of the F-16s and Mirage ROSE, respectively.
Hence, the J-10CE and J-31 are likely sequential, or even parallel programs. BTW, this whole JF-17 PFX thing isn't a sure thing either. It could fail and, in turn, force the PAF to look for some other option for shoring up its light/medium-weight fleet (for area-denial and point-defence missions). Thus, if the JF-17 PFX falters, the PAF could aim for 120-150 J-10CEs.
The FC-31/J-31 prototypes have probably been flying regularly. That isn't the issue. Rather, the real question is when we can expect a LRIP model. However, it seems that much of SAC's work at the moment is going towards the J-35. @Deino
I agree on historic part. I understand that ideally PAF always wanted to fill atleast 4-5 squadrons for each aircraft type. As you include more, the overall cost per aircraft reduces. Its not just the aircrafts but trainings and logistics as well. But there is a certain threshold to which you can take that.
However, still I think this would change in future. The cost of modern aircrafts has shoot up and the state of Pakistan's economy has gone down. Secondly, previously PAF only relied majorly on manned aircrafts. However, now PAF is also investing quite a lot on all sorts of drones and surface to air missiles. In addition, PAF never had any force multipliers prior to 2010. From 2010 onwards, PAF has to spent subtantial amount on force multipliers AEW&Cs, aerial fuel tankers, their maintenance, logistics, crew trainings, etc. So a lot has changed from the past. Modern warfare requires a more balanced force and we now no longer has liberty to induct 100+ manned aircrafts of every type. We got quite significant expenditures in SAMs, Cyberspace, UCAVs, every sort of munitions, force multipliers and more.
I believe its just not Pakistan but other countries will also reduce their manned aircrafts to some extent. The acquisition cost and flying hourly cost of these modern 4.5 gen / 5 gen aircrafts is way too high. Plus lot of new critical areas have emerged that needs investments. These are all the reasons on which I believe that golden 90 figure won't be true for next platforms. Some believed that initial order of J-10Cs was 60, while many believed it is 36. I never understood where those numbers came, perhaps people assumed that atleast 2 squadrons as initial order. However it found out only 20 aircrafts were the initial order. That number certainly will increase but perhaps not the way most are expecting. This will be even more applicable to J-31s.