SC rebukes ‘misconceived’ ECP clarification request, orders immediate implentation of reserved seats verdict

[prothought]

You wanna put 200 million youthias in jail?

Correction. It's only 200 yo*thias. Come out of your fool's paradise.

 

[prothought]

WHO will clean other pillars of the state such as parliament and executive when there is no independent judiciary left?

The parent institution, i.e. the parliament. One more constitutional amendment and all shit thrown out of 138th positioned judiciary.

 

[Jf Thunder]

The third pillar has been infested by criminals, crooks, and filthy yo*thias. There is a dire need to clean this pillar.

how much are you being for this though?

I wonder, the last person to suspend the constitution was Chief Justice Musharraf, right?

 

[FOOLS_NIGHTMARE]

 

[Forsvaret]

Correction. It's only 200 yo*thias. Come out of your fool's paradise.

Did only 200 youthias vote in recent general elections? Patwari fool!

 

[Forsvaret]

The parent institution, i.e. the parliament. One more constitutional amendment and all shit thrown out of 138th positioned judiciary.

How do you get “one more” constitutional amendment from a parliament - which is stuffed with parliamentarians who “won” on form 47 (boot licking magic)?

 

[Forsvaret]

View attachment 66182

SC has the final decision making power as per the constitution. There is no “face off”. It’s just boot mafia not willing to accept SC’s decisions.

 

[prothought]

Lao jee, those dishonest eight judges of supreme court have finally kicked the bomb due to their sheer stupidity. Their inner imranduism have forced them to overstep the judges’ code of conduct, law clauses, and constitutional articles. They have been acting as boars in China shop.

In their uncontrolled pursuit of political goals, these eight judges issued a warning of serious consequences if their earlier verdict was not implemented in a four-page statement about eight days ago. This statement came out in response to a miscellaneous application filed by the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on reserved seats.

Now the chief justice of Pakistan has demanded answers from the supreme court registrar office for nine questions in response to the explanation provided by eight judges in the case.

The gang of those eight imrandu judges have apparently committed a serious breach of the judges conduct, their oath, and articles of constitution. They are clearly guilty of misconduct and that is an extremely grave violation that a judge can commit.

The boars in China shop have finally trapped themselves with unlawful, dishonest, non-impartial, and rogue conduct. I can see their case finally heading towards the judicial commission’s proceedings.

 

[Forsvaret]

The gang of those eight imrandu judges have apparently committed a serious breach of the judges conduct, their oath, and articles of constitution. They are clearly guilty of misconduct and that is an extremely grave violation that a judge can commit.

Imrandu judges… apparently… clearly guilty… all signs of mental retardation seen in boot licking Bughaz e Imranis!

@PakFactor @ghazi52 @koolio @SaadH @Respect4Respect @FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

 

[newb3e]

Boot licking Patwari

ohh bhai hijay kar keh poora patwaran demag ka zoor laga keh maryam keh kaneez nay takreer likhi and all your replied were three words!! bloody zalim youthiya!

 

[PakFactor]

Imrandu judges… apparently… clearly guilty… all signs of mental retardation seen in boot licking Bughaz e Imranis!

@PakFactor @ghazi52 @koolio @SaadH @Respect4Respect @FOOLS_NIGHTMARE

If we look for idiots, we don't need to look far, as prothought types are readily available.

Seeing him, I pray he has children who are mirror images of Nawas and Shahbaz look-alikes.

 

[Mr X]

Well my take on the Reserved seat is clear

If we were to follow the constitution then yes the 8 judges breached the constitution and gave the decision in favour of PTI. Throughout the proceedings, the lawyers were asked that if they are representing PTI or SIC and all of them maintained the stance of SIC.

But if we read the decision on the basis of fairness then the 8 judges did the correct decision and they bypassed the complications of the rule to give complete justice to the political party who was deprived to contest the election in the first place.

The court should always follow the constitution but what do you do in the set up of Pakistan where the Government and the establishment is unwilling to follow the constitution and bending rules to pursue their personal objectives.

Extraordinary measures in extraordinary circumstances

 

[Jf Thunder]

it surprises me, that when the same judges of the supreme court upheld the Practice and Procedure Act, took the bat symbol away and clarified the Article 62 ruling, everything was hunky dory.

Now that a majority decision has come ruling that PTI is a political party, everyone has lost their damn minds. It is high time the Supreme Court asserts itself as truly the Supreme Law Interpretation Institution !

"Let Justice Be Done though the Heavens Fall"

 

[M. Sarmad]

If we were to follow the constitution then yes the 8 judges breached the constitution and gave the decision in favour of PTI.

Could you please clarify which specific section or clause of the Constitution has been breached by these 8/majority judges in their ruling? Or perhaps "breach" may not be the most appropriate term in this context?

 

[Mr X]

Could you please clarify which specific section or clause of the Constitution has been breached by these 8/majority judges in their ruling? Or perhaps "breach" may not be the most appropriate term in this context?

I thought it was a common sense or a matter of basic public awareness.

SIC represented the case against the state

The judges asked who are you representing PTI or SIC. The SIC stated SIC only. The judges inquired if anybody is representing PTI and nobody came forward.

The proceedings began, the case was about 80 independent candidates. None of them were presented in the court or heard about their stance whether they were part of the PTI or not.

The case was decided in favour of the party which SIC did not own during their live proceedings in the court and the 41 MNAs who did not file anything about PTI were declared PTI without hearing them.

I am sure all of us followed the proceedings so it’s not rocket science. Even the PTI lawyers including Hamid Khan and Salman Akram Raja were asked that how did the Supreme Court reached this shocking conclusion and they said, we guess they used article 185 of complete justice and we are confident that they will mention article 185 in the detailed judgement to justify this act.

I am not saying this judgement is wrong, PTI deserved these seats but on the basis of fairness, my guess is that is why the detailed judgement has not been made public despite 3 months passed as they want to give the legal ground. The judges clearly acknowledged the malafide intentions of the government and gave the justice like a “Qazi” and not like the judges of the Supreme Court.