As I said before, he's been repeating the same STUPID crap for 4000 PAGES on this topic starting from the old PDF!! He just doesn't get it that this is not just 'occupation' but also displacement!!
The Afghans fought against heavy odds against two Super Powers: The Soviets in the 1980s and the Americans in the 2000s/2010s; the Vietnamese fought against the American Super Power when the American military and economic power was truly unmatched. The Algerians fought against a resurgent France of post World War II. And there are surely other wars like theirs.
But one thing common in those resistance movements: The natives would NOT be displaced. The Israel-Palestine conflict, as @UKBengali said in a post above today, is very different. He also mentioned the South African resistance against colonialism and he was right: The natives would not be displaced. It would be an old fashioned exploitation in all of the above cases. But Israelis have a different plan.
And yet some people draw false parallels between some Podunk, periphery of humanity blah blah territory in southeast Asia with Eurasia and with Israel. Stay in your Podunk Indonesia!!
We may be abeing a bit harsh on @Indos here.
He is 100% on the side of Palestine like the rest of us but just disagrees on the method of resistance.
It seems that he thinks that it will work out in the end by just being patient and waiting for the balance of power to change.
That is a legitimate view if you thought that the Zionist agenda is to not expel and kill nearly all Palestinians out of Palestine before the balance of power changes.
In essence, most of us think that they want to "settle" this soon and have all the surrounding states accept and normalise with them, that even the peoples of the region would think they are a normal nation and so their presence becomes permanent.